37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 335558 |
Time | |
Date | 199605 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : phx |
State Reference | AZ |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 3900 msl bound upper : 3900 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : phx tower : dal |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 245 flight time total : 10600 flight time type : 250 |
ASRS Report | 335558 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Toward the termination of a 5 hour empty ferry flight from boston to phoenix in an airbus A320, we received clearance to 10000 ft MSL from the phx approach controller. Within 35 NM from phx, we accepted the visual approach to runway 26R. Being very familiar with the airport and its environments, I set the altitude limit in the flight control unit to 6000 ft, intending to level at 6000 ft to begin flap extension and speed reduction. I knew this altitude would provide suitable terrain clearance in the area, as the minimum vector altitude was 4700 ft. During the descent in 'open descent/idle' mode, our descent rate seemed excessive (uncomfortable) and I elected to switch to the vertical speed mode to effect the remainder of the descent to 6000 ft. I did this, and verified on the flight mode annunciator that indeed we were in vertical speed mode. Being new to this aircraft, I have been especially careful to double-check my actions as it is very different from the boeing series (757) that I previously flew. However, this did not prevent my error somewhere along the descent. Apparently, during the attempt to adjust the vertical speed selector knob to modulate our descent, (which at this time we were extending flaps and preparing to turn final), I must have grabbed the altitude selector knob located on the flight control unit just to the left of the vertical speed knob. As I desired a greater descent rate, I turned it down while looking outside for the runway alignment/traffic. Not realizing that I did not effect a change in descent rate, but rather a lower altitude in the descent, I again reached to the vertical speed knob and selected a greater descent rate. In retrospect, I selected a high descent rate (2ND try) to a low altitude of 3800 ft MSL (1ST try). Although we were low, I had the runway in sight and was flying 'head outside,' as was my first officer. We received a GPWS terrain closure rate warning just as ATC advised we were too low in a higher terrain sector. We effected an immediate climb from approximately 3900 ft to 4500 ft when the warning canceled and terrain slope toward the airport increased. Normal landing was completed. Although it's easy to make excuses for one's obvious mistakes, I believe a combination of different operational techniques/procedures between the B757/A320 and the late night visual approach acceptance certainly contributed to my errors. It has however, driven home the importance in the A320 to not only check flight mode annunciator indications for mode, but also to check what your own hand is turning on the flight control unit, especially in VFR, head-up and outside flight conditions. I hope others will benefit from this incident.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: GPWS. TERRAIN CLOSURE DUE TO INAPPROPRIATE SELECTION OF ALT KNOB, THINKING IT WAS THE VERT SPD KNOB. CONSEQUENTLY THE ALT SELECTED WAS TOO LOW FOR TERRAIN CLRNC.
Narrative: TOWARD THE TERMINATION OF A 5 HR EMPTY FERRY FLT FROM BOSTON TO PHOENIX IN AN AIRBUS A320, WE RECEIVED CLRNC TO 10000 FT MSL FROM THE PHX APCH CTLR. WITHIN 35 NM FROM PHX, WE ACCEPTED THE VISUAL APCH TO RWY 26R. BEING VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE ARPT AND ITS ENVIRONMENTS, I SET THE ALT LIMIT IN THE FLT CTL UNIT TO 6000 FT, INTENDING TO LEVEL AT 6000 FT TO BEGIN FLAP EXTENSION AND SPD REDUCTION. I KNEW THIS ALT WOULD PROVIDE SUITABLE TERRAIN CLRNC IN THE AREA, AS THE MINIMUM VECTOR ALT WAS 4700 FT. DURING THE DSCNT IN 'OPEN DSCNT/IDLE' MODE, OUR DSCNT RATE SEEMED EXCESSIVE (UNCOMFORTABLE) AND I ELECTED TO SWITCH TO THE VERT SPD MODE TO EFFECT THE REMAINDER OF THE DSCNT TO 6000 FT. I DID THIS, AND VERIFIED ON THE FLT MODE ANNUNCIATOR THAT INDEED WE WERE IN VERT SPD MODE. BEING NEW TO THIS ACFT, I HAVE BEEN ESPECIALLY CAREFUL TO DOUBLE-CHK MY ACTIONS AS IT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM THE BOEING SERIES (757) THAT I PREVIOUSLY FLEW. HOWEVER, THIS DID NOT PREVENT MY ERROR SOMEWHERE ALONG THE DSCNT. APPARENTLY, DURING THE ATTEMPT TO ADJUST THE VERT SPD SELECTOR KNOB TO MODULATE OUR DSCNT, (WHICH AT THIS TIME WE WERE EXTENDING FLAPS AND PREPARING TO TURN FINAL), I MUST HAVE GRABBED THE ALT SELECTOR KNOB LOCATED ON THE FLT CTL UNIT JUST TO THE L OF THE VERT SPD KNOB. AS I DESIRED A GREATER DSCNT RATE, I TURNED IT DOWN WHILE LOOKING OUTSIDE FOR THE RWY ALIGNMENT/TFC. NOT REALIZING THAT I DID NOT EFFECT A CHANGE IN DSCNT RATE, BUT RATHER A LOWER ALT IN THE DSCNT, I AGAIN REACHED TO THE VERT SPD KNOB AND SELECTED A GREATER DSCNT RATE. IN RETROSPECT, I SELECTED A HIGH DSCNT RATE (2ND TRY) TO A LOW ALT OF 3800 FT MSL (1ST TRY). ALTHOUGH WE WERE LOW, I HAD THE RWY IN SIGHT AND WAS FLYING 'HEAD OUTSIDE,' AS WAS MY FO. WE RECEIVED A GPWS TERRAIN CLOSURE RATE WARNING JUST AS ATC ADVISED WE WERE TOO LOW IN A HIGHER TERRAIN SECTOR. WE EFFECTED AN IMMEDIATE CLB FROM APPROX 3900 FT TO 4500 FT WHEN THE WARNING CANCELED AND TERRAIN SLOPE TOWARD THE ARPT INCREASED. NORMAL LNDG WAS COMPLETED. ALTHOUGH IT'S EASY TO MAKE EXCUSES FOR ONE'S OBVIOUS MISTAKES, I BELIEVE A COMBINATION OF DIFFERENT OPERATIONAL TECHNIQUES/PROCS BTWN THE B757/A320 AND THE LATE NIGHT VISUAL APCH ACCEPTANCE CERTAINLY CONTRIBUTED TO MY ERRORS. IT HAS HOWEVER, DRIVEN HOME THE IMPORTANCE IN THE A320 TO NOT ONLY CHK FLT MODE ANNUNCIATOR INDICATIONS FOR MODE, BUT ALSO TO CHK WHAT YOUR OWN HAND IS TURNING ON THE FLT CTL UNIT, ESPECIALLY IN VFR, HEAD-UP AND OUTSIDE FLT CONDITIONS. I HOPE OTHERS WILL BENEFIT FROM THIS INCIDENT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.