Narrative:

WX was poor. Frequency congestion was very bad. (This sector has 6 paired frequencys.) the aircraft was informed what to expect for his planning purposes and concurrence. He stated it back as a clearance. I did not recognize the bad altitude in the readback and restated it to him, confirming the wrong altitude. I had just asked for a d-side due to complexity, not volume. The supervisor arrived to look at things as the separation was lost. Supervisor, not controllers (who are preoccupied by their situation) should be responsible for monitoring better. Pilots need to be more responsible for the information they restate when they are uncertain, rather than just guessing.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: LTSS BTWN C172 AND C310 WHEN ONE OF THE PLTS MISCOPIED AND READ BACK THE WRONG ALT. RPTR RESTATED WRONG ALT BACK TO PLT.

Narrative: WX WAS POOR. FREQ CONGESTION WAS VERY BAD. (THIS SECTOR HAS 6 PAIRED FREQS.) THE ACFT WAS INFORMED WHAT TO EXPECT FOR HIS PLANNING PURPOSES AND CONCURRENCE. HE STATED IT BACK AS A CLRNC. I DID NOT RECOGNIZE THE BAD ALT IN THE READBACK AND RESTATED IT TO HIM, CONFIRMING THE WRONG ALT. I HAD JUST ASKED FOR A D-SIDE DUE TO COMPLEXITY, NOT VOLUME. THE SUPVR ARRIVED TO LOOK AT THINGS AS THE SEPARATION WAS LOST. SUPVR, NOT CTLRS (WHO ARE PREOCCUPIED BY THEIR SIT) SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING BETTER. PLTS NEED TO BE MORE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INFO THEY RESTATE WHEN THEY ARE UNCERTAIN, RATHER THAN JUST GUESSING.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.