37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 336710 |
Time | |
Date | 199605 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : cwa |
State Reference | WI |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 400 agl bound upper : 400 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : cwa |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude climbout : initial |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | PA-28 Cherokee/Archer II/Dakota/Pillan/Warrior |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 60 flight time total : 1800 flight time type : 60 |
ASRS Report | 336710 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : took evasive action other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
We were cleared for takeoff and runway heading. Tower also advised us of traffic on practice ILS opposite direction inside OM. We initiated the takeoff and as we climbed through 400 ft AGL tower handed us off to center. At that point we were not able to acquire a visual on the traffic, nor were we able to see it on our TCASII. We then decided to make a left deviation to clear the approach course of opposite direction traffic before we were directed to by center. I feel this problem was caused by a lack of information. We knew where the traffic was when we initiated the takeoff roll, but we did not know what his intentions were. So, if tower would have given more information, or if we had queried them for more information, I feel the problem could have been avoided. As a side note, the other aircraft was a PA-28 with about 25-30 KTS of wind on the tail for the practice approach.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: RPTR ACFT CLRED FOR TKOF WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO MAINTAIN RWY HDG. FLC ADVISED BY TWR THAT AN ACFT WAS ON PRACTICE APCH ON RECIPROCAL OF THEIR RWY. THINKING THEY BETTER NOT FLY OUT THE APCH COURSE, FLC ALTERED HDG WITHOUT CLRNC. PROBABLE CONFLICT AS A RESULT. CALLBACK ATTEMPTED SEVERAL TIMES TO OBTAIN MORE COMPLETE INFO, BUT UNABLE TO CONTACT RPTR.
Narrative: WE WERE CLRED FOR TKOF AND RWY HDG. TWR ALSO ADVISED US OF TFC ON PRACTICE ILS OPPOSITE DIRECTION INSIDE OM. WE INITIATED THE TKOF AND AS WE CLBED THROUGH 400 FT AGL TWR HANDED US OFF TO CTR. AT THAT POINT WE WERE NOT ABLE TO ACQUIRE A VISUAL ON THE TFC, NOR WERE WE ABLE TO SEE IT ON OUR TCASII. WE THEN DECIDED TO MAKE A L DEV TO CLR THE APCH COURSE OF OPPOSITE DIRECTION TFC BEFORE WE WERE DIRECTED TO BY CTR. I FEEL THIS PROB WAS CAUSED BY A LACK OF INFO. WE KNEW WHERE THE TFC WAS WHEN WE INITIATED THE TKOF ROLL, BUT WE DID NOT KNOW WHAT HIS INTENTIONS WERE. SO, IF TWR WOULD HAVE GIVEN MORE INFO, OR IF WE HAD QUERIED THEM FOR MORE INFO, I FEEL THE PROB COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED. AS A SIDE NOTE, THE OTHER ACFT WAS A PA-28 WITH ABOUT 25-30 KTS OF WIND ON THE TAIL FOR THE PRACTICE APCH.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.