Narrative:

Cruise altitude, about to descend, the autoplt disconnects, FMC fails and we lose all compass information. Our only heading information is the wet compass. We remain VFR and land at nearest suitable airport, psp. The problem went routinely. The problem is a 2 pilot jet aircraft in a busy ATC environment with a problem. In my opinion, as long as all in going well, 2 pilot crews are ok. When there is a problem, 2 pilots in a cockpit, the workload goes off scale, which makes room for potential mistakes. I would much rather fly an aircraft in today's busy ATC and work environment with a flight engineer, than in a 2 pilot jet. I believe that we have compromised safety in going to 2 pilot jet aircraft under the real reason of saving money.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: WHEN FMC FAILS, B737-400 LOSES ALL HDG INFO EXCEPT THE WET COMPASS.

Narrative: CRUISE ALT, ABOUT TO DSND, THE AUTOPLT DISCONNECTS, FMC FAILS AND WE LOSE ALL COMPASS INFO. OUR ONLY HDG INFO IS THE WET COMPASS. WE REMAIN VFR AND LAND AT NEAREST SUITABLE ARPT, PSP. THE PROB WENT ROUTINELY. THE PROB IS A 2 PLT JET ACFT IN A BUSY ATC ENVIRONMENT WITH A PROB. IN MY OPINION, AS LONG AS ALL IN GOING WELL, 2 PLT CREWS ARE OK. WHEN THERE IS A PROB, 2 PLTS IN A COCKPIT, THE WORKLOAD GOES OFF SCALE, WHICH MAKES ROOM FOR POTENTIAL MISTAKES. I WOULD MUCH RATHER FLY AN ACFT IN TODAY'S BUSY ATC AND WORK ENVIRONMENT WITH A FE, THAN IN A 2 PLT JET. I BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE COMPROMISED SAFETY IN GOING TO 2 PLT JET ACFT UNDER THE REAL REASON OF SAVING MONEY.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.