37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 362252 |
Time | |
Date | 199703 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : aml |
State Reference | VA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 6500 msl bound upper : 9000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zdc |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Learjet 35 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 95 flight time total : 2600 flight time type : 600 |
ASRS Report | 362252 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical altitude deviation : excursion from assigned altitude conflict : airborne less severe inflight encounter : weather other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : became reoriented flight crew : overcame equipment problem flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
On climb out, ATC advised us to climb to 9000 ft and turn to a 360 degree heading. The PF completed his climb and turn and, as he began to rollout on the assigned heading, I heard him say 'what the heck!' at that time I noticed the aircraft began to lose altitude, I called his name and said 'altitude' when I noticed a loss of 300 ft. The aircraft then began a rapid descent out of 9000 ft. We were IMC at the time. I took control of the aircraft when the loss of altitude was beyond 1000 ft. I initiated a recovery, but then realized my gyroscope was inoperative and we had now lost over 2500 ft. I then voiced my concern that I had no artificial horizon and the original PF took over and initiated a recovery with the peanut gyroscope. Soon after, his gyroscope returned to operation and my gyroscope began working 15 mins later. This instrument failure nearly killed us and our passenger. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the work on this aircraft is not yet complete, but the first officer's gyroscope has been replaced. This may have corrected the problem as the reporter believes that there was an interconnected problem from side to side. Nothing yet has been found wrong on the left side.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A LEAR 35 HAD A PARTIAL FLT INST FAILURE IN SOLID IMC. THE FO SUSPECTED THAT THE CAPT WAS FLYING POORLY, THEN THE FO REALIZED THAT BOTH ATTITUDE INSTS WERE FAULTY. THE AUX GYROSCOPE SAVED THE DAY AND BOTH MAIN ATTITUDE INSTS LATER CAME BACK ON LINE.
Narrative: ON CLBOUT, ATC ADVISED US TO CLB TO 9000 FT AND TURN TO A 360 DEG HDG. THE PF COMPLETED HIS CLB AND TURN AND, AS HE BEGAN TO ROLLOUT ON THE ASSIGNED HEADING, I HEARD HIM SAY 'WHAT THE HECK!' AT THAT TIME I NOTICED THE ACFT BEGAN TO LOSE ALT, I CALLED HIS NAME AND SAID 'ALT' WHEN I NOTICED A LOSS OF 300 FT. THE ACFT THEN BEGAN A RAPID DSCNT OUT OF 9000 FT. WE WERE IMC AT THE TIME. I TOOK CTL OF THE ACFT WHEN THE LOSS OF ALT WAS BEYOND 1000 FT. I INITIATED A RECOVERY, BUT THEN REALIZED MY GYROSCOPE WAS INOP AND WE HAD NOW LOST OVER 2500 FT. I THEN VOICED MY CONCERN THAT I HAD NO ARTIFICIAL HORIZON AND THE ORIGINAL PF TOOK OVER AND INITIATED A RECOVERY WITH THE PEANUT GYROSCOPE. SOON AFTER, HIS GYROSCOPE RETURNED TO OP AND MY GYROSCOPE BEGAN WORKING 15 MINS LATER. THIS INST FAILURE NEARLY KILLED US AND OUR PAX. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE WORK ON THIS ACFT IS NOT YET COMPLETE, BUT THE FO'S GYROSCOPE HAS BEEN REPLACED. THIS MAY HAVE CORRECTED THE PROB AS THE RPTR BELIEVES THAT THERE WAS AN INTERCONNECTED PROB FROM SIDE TO SIDE. NOTHING YET HAS BEEN FOUND WRONG ON THE L SIDE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.