37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 364004 |
Time | |
Date | 199702 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : phl |
State Reference | PA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 700 agl bound upper : 700 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : phl tower : phl |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Challenger CL601 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | Other Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : go around landing other |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | DC-8 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent other landing other |
Route In Use | approach : visual approach : straight in arrival other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 120 flight time total : 6600 flight time type : 250 |
ASRS Report | 364004 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : exited adverse environment other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | procedure or policy : unspecified |
Narrative:
Late night to early morning arrival at phl. Aircraft landing to the west utilizing runways 27L and 27R. WX: relatively high ceilings with winds at the initial approach altitude and at the surface coming from the south at 8-10 KTS or greater, visibility good. Problem at hand: runways 27L and 27R are parallel with approximately 1400 ft between runway ctrlines, however, their respective thresholds are staggered with runway 27L threshold being approximately 5000 ft further west than that of runway 27R. Phl ATC likes to accommodate air carrier cargo aircraft by issuing approach clrncs to runway 27L. (The air carrier ramp and terminal are just on the south side of runway 27L.) since the runways are staggered, the glide angle for runway 27L is higher than the one for runway 27R in a given block of airspace. ATC then sequences our arrival for runway 27R behind the air carrier 'heavy' on approach for runway 27L. While trying to intercept our respective 'GS's,' it becomes quite obvious that even with 4-6 mi in trail, our altitude is still much lower than the preceding 'heavy' to where it becomes necessary to adjust our glide path to a much higher than normal track. The southerly wind exacerbates the problem by blowing the 'heavy's' vortices right onto our flight path making it virtually impossible for us to descend to the normal glide path zone in order to make a normal landing. Both occurrences resulted in a wake turbulence encounter requiring a go around. Another distressing problem and one that needs to be addressed immediately is the cavalier attitude of some controllers in regard to the definition of 'heavy' aircraft and their mental criteria for which aircraft produce more of a wake than others. Let it be known that a B737 and a B727 will FLIP you just as fast and hard as a B747, B757, B767, and a B777. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter participated in the wake turbulence structured callback program. Reporter's main complaint is that heavier aircraft are given higher altitudes to descend from when approaching a terminal and when in the terminal area they are given the runway that has a displaced threshold. In both cases it puts his lighter weight aircraft in a more likely place to encounter wake turbulence. He realizes there are other reasons why aircraft are sequenced this way, however, he is very worn out from all the wake encounters he is involved in as he approachs his destination. He has encountered it so much he can pretty well predict when it is going to be a problem for him. He figures if he can predict when wake is going to be a problem for him, why can't the controllers.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CANADAIR CL601-3R JET ENCOUNTERS WAKE TURB FROM A DC8 WHILE LNDG AT PHL. FLC ANTICIPATES THE WAKE, AT FIRST SIGNS OF TURB THEY EXECUTE A GAR. FLC HAS HAD MANY OTHER WAKE TURB EVENTS AND HAS GREAT RESPECT FOR ANY SIGNS OF WAKE THAT MIGHT INDICATE A LOSS OF CTL IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN.
Narrative: LATE NIGHT TO EARLY MORNING ARR AT PHL. ACFT LNDG TO THE W UTILIZING RWYS 27L AND 27R. WX: RELATIVELY HIGH CEILINGS WITH WINDS AT THE INITIAL APCH ALT AND AT THE SURFACE COMING FROM THE S AT 8-10 KTS OR GREATER, VISIBILITY GOOD. PROB AT HAND: RWYS 27L AND 27R ARE PARALLEL WITH APPROX 1400 FT BTWN RWY CTRLINES, HOWEVER, THEIR RESPECTIVE THRESHOLDS ARE STAGGERED WITH RWY 27L THRESHOLD BEING APPROX 5000 FT FURTHER W THAN THAT OF RWY 27R. PHL ATC LIKES TO ACCOMMODATE ACR CARGO ACFT BY ISSUING APCH CLRNCS TO RWY 27L. (THE ACR RAMP AND TERMINAL ARE JUST ON THE S SIDE OF RWY 27L.) SINCE THE RWYS ARE STAGGERED, THE GLIDE ANGLE FOR RWY 27L IS HIGHER THAN THE ONE FOR RWY 27R IN A GIVEN BLOCK OF AIRSPACE. ATC THEN SEQUENCES OUR ARR FOR RWY 27R BEHIND THE ACR 'HVY' ON APCH FOR RWY 27L. WHILE TRYING TO INTERCEPT OUR RESPECTIVE 'GS'S,' IT BECOMES QUITE OBVIOUS THAT EVEN WITH 4-6 MI IN TRAIL, OUR ALT IS STILL MUCH LOWER THAN THE PRECEDING 'HVY' TO WHERE IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO ADJUST OUR GLIDE PATH TO A MUCH HIGHER THAN NORMAL TRACK. THE SOUTHERLY WIND EXACERBATES THE PROB BY BLOWING THE 'HVY'S' VORTICES RIGHT ONTO OUR FLT PATH MAKING IT VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR US TO DSND TO THE NORMAL GLIDE PATH ZONE IN ORDER TO MAKE A NORMAL LNDG. BOTH OCCURRENCES RESULTED IN A WAKE TURB ENCOUNTER REQUIRING A GAR. ANOTHER DISTRESSING PROB AND ONE THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IMMEDIATELY IS THE CAVALIER ATTITUDE OF SOME CTLRS IN REGARD TO THE DEFINITION OF 'HVY' ACFT AND THEIR MENTAL CRITERIA FOR WHICH ACFT PRODUCE MORE OF A WAKE THAN OTHERS. LET IT BE KNOWN THAT A B737 AND A B727 WILL FLIP YOU JUST AS FAST AND HARD AS A B747, B757, B767, AND A B777. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR PARTICIPATED IN THE WAKE TURB STRUCTURED CALLBACK PROGRAM. RPTR'S MAIN COMPLAINT IS THAT HEAVIER ACFT ARE GIVEN HIGHER ALTS TO DSND FROM WHEN APCHING A TERMINAL AND WHEN IN THE TERMINAL AREA THEY ARE GIVEN THE RWY THAT HAS A DISPLACED THRESHOLD. IN BOTH CASES IT PUTS HIS LIGHTER WT ACFT IN A MORE LIKELY PLACE TO ENCOUNTER WAKE TURB. HE REALIZES THERE ARE OTHER REASONS WHY ACFT ARE SEQUENCED THIS WAY, HOWEVER, HE IS VERY WORN OUT FROM ALL THE WAKE ENCOUNTERS HE IS INVOLVED IN AS HE APCHS HIS DEST. HE HAS ENCOUNTERED IT SO MUCH HE CAN PRETTY WELL PREDICT WHEN IT IS GOING TO BE A PROB FOR HIM. HE FIGURES IF HE CAN PREDICT WHEN WAKE IS GOING TO BE A PROB FOR HIM, WHY CAN'T THE CTLRS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.