Narrative:

A low speed aborted takeoff, with both engines being inadvertently shut down. We did clear off the active runways 13/4 and stopped on the taxiway. After being cleared into position on the runway, I noticed we didn't have the 'takeoff confign ok' message on the EICAS. After a quick discussion, we re-ran all the checklists, we told the tower we need a min to check something. Unable to bring the message up, we decided to advance the power levers, knowing the aircraft would tell us the confign problem, if there was one. We accepted the next takeoff clearance, advanced the power levers, knowing that if we got a warning we would abort the takeoff. At approximately 30-40 KTS, we got the rudder confign warning. I initiated the abort (this is the captain procedure), the captain to retrim the rudder. I told the captain to notify tower, which he did. At this point clear of the landing runway 4, I attempted to pull the power levers into reverse (problem was I had just completed training on a turboprop), and incorrectly pulled the power levers to shutoff. I informed the captain that the engine had been shut off and that we need to clear the runway as soon as possible. He took control and cleared onto the taxiway. Tower called out the emergency equipment, some smoke from the left engine appeared due to the shutdown. After the equipment checked us, we cleared the confign problem and restarted the engines and returned for takeoff (no further problems). This was my first trip back as a first officer on the jet (CL65) after 6 weeks. 5 weeks training initial upgrade for the turboprop (EMB120) and 1 week of vacation. No recurrent training was provided for the jet first officer position, as I was going to fly 2 weeks as a first officer before getting my captain position on the EMB120. This is a xtraining problem. The abort procedure in the CL65 is a captain maneuver. The company was informed, and a crew counseling and training session was set up, followed by a CRM session. Changes need to be made in returning crew member to their old aircraft after training on another type. This is not a completely isolated occurrence.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FO INADVERTENTLY SHUT OFF BOTH ENGS DURING AN ABORTED TKOF DUE TO THE RUDDER TRIM CONFIGURE WARNING LIGHT COMING ON WHEN PWR WAS APPLIED.

Narrative: A LOW SPD ABORTED TKOF, WITH BOTH ENGS BEING INADVERTENTLY SHUT DOWN. WE DID CLR OFF THE ACTIVE RWYS 13/4 AND STOPPED ON THE TXWY. AFTER BEING CLRED INTO POS ON THE RWY, I NOTICED WE DIDN'T HAVE THE 'TKOF CONFIGN OK' MESSAGE ON THE EICAS. AFTER A QUICK DISCUSSION, WE RE-RAN ALL THE CHKLISTS, WE TOLD THE TWR WE NEED A MIN TO CHK SOMETHING. UNABLE TO BRING THE MESSAGE UP, WE DECIDED TO ADVANCE THE PWR LEVERS, KNOWING THE ACFT WOULD TELL US THE CONFIGN PROB, IF THERE WAS ONE. WE ACCEPTED THE NEXT TKOF CLRNC, ADVANCED THE PWR LEVERS, KNOWING THAT IF WE GOT A WARNING WE WOULD ABORT THE TKOF. AT APPROX 30-40 KTS, WE GOT THE RUDDER CONFIGN WARNING. I INITIATED THE ABORT (THIS IS THE CAPT PROC), THE CAPT TO RETRIM THE RUDDER. I TOLD THE CAPT TO NOTIFY TWR, WHICH HE DID. AT THIS POINT CLR OF THE LNDG RWY 4, I ATTEMPTED TO PULL THE PWR LEVERS INTO REVERSE (PROB WAS I HAD JUST COMPLETED TRAINING ON A TURBOPROP), AND INCORRECTLY PULLED THE PWR LEVERS TO SHUTOFF. I INFORMED THE CAPT THAT THE ENG HAD BEEN SHUT OFF AND THAT WE NEED TO CLR THE RWY ASAP. HE TOOK CTL AND CLRED ONTO THE TXWY. TWR CALLED OUT THE EMER EQUIP, SOME SMOKE FROM THE L ENG APPEARED DUE TO THE SHUTDOWN. AFTER THE EQUIP CHKED US, WE CLRED THE CONFIGN PROB AND RESTARTED THE ENGS AND RETURNED FOR TKOF (NO FURTHER PROBS). THIS WAS MY FIRST TRIP BACK AS A FO ON THE JET (CL65) AFTER 6 WKS. 5 WKS TRAINING INITIAL UPGRADE FOR THE TURBOPROP (EMB120) AND 1 WK OF VACATION. NO RECURRENT TRAINING WAS PROVIDED FOR THE JET FO POS, AS I WAS GOING TO FLY 2 WKS AS A FO BEFORE GETTING MY CAPT POS ON THE EMB120. THIS IS A XTRAINING PROB. THE ABORT PROC IN THE CL65 IS A CAPT MANEUVER. THE COMPANY WAS INFORMED, AND A CREW COUNSELING AND TRAINING SESSION WAS SET UP, FOLLOWED BY A CRM SESSION. CHANGES NEED TO BE MADE IN RETURNING CREW MEMBER TO THEIR OLD ACFT AFTER TRAINING ON ANOTHER TYPE. THIS IS NOT A COMPLETELY ISOLATED OCCURRENCE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.