37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 365228 |
Time | |
Date | 199704 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : eno |
State Reference | DE |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 15000 msl bound upper : 15000 |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Super 80 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | cruise other cruise other |
Route In Use | arrival other arrival star : star enroute airway : zdc |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 365228 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
ASRS Report | 365230 |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Descending on waard 5 arrival into ewr, first officer flying. We crossed eno and dialed in outbound radial of 044 degrees. First officer asked if I would tune rbv 238 degree radial on my side and I did so, even though the intersection of the 2 radials was approximately 50 NM away. I then began studying the arrival and approach chart. I then heard the first officer talking about not being able to capture the eno 044 degree radial. I looked up and saw that he was turning the wrong way and was confused. Just after I had him turn back to capture the radial, ATC asked our heading. I replied turning to 060 degrees. ATC said we were 5 NM left of course and I replied that we were correcting. To my knowledge no conflicts were noted and remainder of flight was uneventful. In the future I will monitor course changes and assure that we are properly established before attending to other duties.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FO OF A SUPER MD80 FAILED TO TRACK OUTBOUND FROM THE VOR ON THE STAR PUBLISHED ARR RTE RESULTING IN ATC INTERVENTION WHO INFORMED THEM THAT THEY WERE 5 MI OFF COURSE.
Narrative: DSNDING ON WAARD 5 ARR INTO EWR, FO FLYING. WE CROSSED ENO AND DIALED IN OUTBOUND RADIAL OF 044 DEGS. FO ASKED IF I WOULD TUNE RBV 238 DEG RADIAL ON MY SIDE AND I DID SO, EVEN THOUGH THE INTXN OF THE 2 RADIALS WAS APPROX 50 NM AWAY. I THEN BEGAN STUDYING THE ARR AND APCH CHART. I THEN HEARD THE FO TALKING ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO CAPTURE THE ENO 044 DEG RADIAL. I LOOKED UP AND SAW THAT HE WAS TURNING THE WRONG WAY AND WAS CONFUSED. JUST AFTER I HAD HIM TURN BACK TO CAPTURE THE RADIAL, ATC ASKED OUR HDG. I REPLIED TURNING TO 060 DEGS. ATC SAID WE WERE 5 NM L OF COURSE AND I REPLIED THAT WE WERE CORRECTING. TO MY KNOWLEDGE NO CONFLICTS WERE NOTED AND REMAINDER OF FLT WAS UNEVENTFUL. IN THE FUTURE I WILL MONITOR COURSE CHANGES AND ASSURE THAT WE ARE PROPERLY ESTABLISHED BEFORE ATTENDING TO OTHER DUTIES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.