37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 367825 |
Time | |
Date | 199704 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : vny airport : cma |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 5000 msl bound upper : 5000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : bur artcc : zkc |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | BN-2A Islander/Defender |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | cruise other |
Route In Use | enroute : direct enroute airway : bur |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Boeing Company Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Route In Use | arrival other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 30 flight time total : 4300 flight time type : 60 |
ASRS Report | 367825 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne less severe other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | Other |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 2000 vertical : 500 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
I departed cma at XI00 local on a VFR climb to 5000 ft eastbound towards vny VOR. Although the WX in cma was clear with good visibility, I had opted for an IFR flight plan because I knew I'd be flying with the sun in my eyes and it was likely to restrict my visibility. After reaching 5000 ft I was cleared direct vny VOR. Not long after that traffic was called at my 9 O'clock as (B737 or B757?). I reported it in sight and was instructed to maintain visual separation with it. Soon after, air carrier X reported me in sight and were given the same instruction to maintain visual separation. (I had been told that air carrier X would be descending.) I was indeed keeping the other aircraft in sight but I misjudged the convergence course that we were on. In an instant the situation seemed to change from normal to do something quick! In the second as I was deciding which way to turn to avoid them, a voice from air carrier X said that it looked like I was turning right into them. In fact I had not yet initiated a turn but an instant later I started a turn to pass behind the other aircraft. A voice from the air carrier X aircraft indicated I should have started my turn much earlier. Indeed I would have if I had not misjudged the closure rate. I had fully expected them to pass well east of me and at a lower altitude. However, the air carrier X crew had reported me in sight, were also instructed to maintain visual separation, and were on 'the left' in a converging situation. We obviously both misjudged to distance. If I had judged it better this wouldn't have happened. As to factors affecting this situation -- I was not overly tired, the aircraft was fully functioning. It was a human perception error.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PLT OF AN ATX BN2, ISLANDER, MISJUDGED THE ACR TFC AND MADE A QUICK TURN TO AVOID AN MLG ON DSCNT PASSING THROUGH RPTR'S FLT PATH. VISUAL SEPARATION IN USE.
Narrative: I DEPARTED CMA AT XI00 LCL ON A VFR CLB TO 5000 FT EBOUND TOWARDS VNY VOR. ALTHOUGH THE WX IN CMA WAS CLR WITH GOOD VISIBILITY, I HAD OPTED FOR AN IFR FLT PLAN BECAUSE I KNEW I'D BE FLYING WITH THE SUN IN MY EYES AND IT WAS LIKELY TO RESTRICT MY VISIBILITY. AFTER REACHING 5000 FT I WAS CLRED DIRECT VNY VOR. NOT LONG AFTER THAT TFC WAS CALLED AT MY 9 O'CLOCK AS (B737 OR B757?). I RPTED IT IN SIGHT AND WAS INSTRUCTED TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION WITH IT. SOON AFTER, ACR X RPTED ME IN SIGHT AND WERE GIVEN THE SAME INSTRUCTION TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION. (I HAD BEEN TOLD THAT ACR X WOULD BE DSNDING.) I WAS INDEED KEEPING THE OTHER ACFT IN SIGHT BUT I MISJUDGED THE CONVERGENCE COURSE THAT WE WERE ON. IN AN INSTANT THE SIT SEEMED TO CHANGE FROM NORMAL TO DO SOMETHING QUICK! IN THE SECOND AS I WAS DECIDING WHICH WAY TO TURN TO AVOID THEM, A VOICE FROM ACR X SAID THAT IT LOOKED LIKE I WAS TURNING RIGHT INTO THEM. IN FACT I HAD NOT YET INITIATED A TURN BUT AN INSTANT LATER I STARTED A TURN TO PASS BEHIND THE OTHER ACFT. A VOICE FROM THE ACR X ACFT INDICATED I SHOULD HAVE STARTED MY TURN MUCH EARLIER. INDEED I WOULD HAVE IF I HAD NOT MISJUDGED THE CLOSURE RATE. I HAD FULLY EXPECTED THEM TO PASS WELL E OF ME AND AT A LOWER ALT. HOWEVER, THE ACR X CREW HAD RPTED ME IN SIGHT, WERE ALSO INSTRUCTED TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION, AND WERE ON 'THE L' IN A CONVERGING SIT. WE OBVIOUSLY BOTH MISJUDGED TO DISTANCE. IF I HAD JUDGED IT BETTER THIS WOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED. AS TO FACTORS AFFECTING THIS SIT -- I WAS NOT OVERLY TIRED, THE ACFT WAS FULLY FUNCTIONING. IT WAS A HUMAN PERCEPTION ERROR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.