Narrative:

Flight plan release reflected aircraft to be in CAT ii status. However, during our layover, I noticed that the maintenance at lubbock station had worked on aircraft and the logbook (and airplane) was in 'not CAT ii' status. I did not update flight plan/release to reflect it. We operated flight under IFR flight plan, and visual (VFR) conditions existed at our destination. I am simply concerned that the paperwork between the flight plan/release and the aircraft log did not agree. Flight was normal with no incidents.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: PIC OF B737 FREIGHTER FAILS TO CHANGE FLT PLAN CODING SO AS TO REFLECT THE CORRECT STATUS RELATIVE TO CAT II OPS. THE LOGBOOK CARRIED SOME ACFT EQUIP PROBS OR DEFERMENTS THAT DISALLOWED ANY CAT II TYPE OPS.

Narrative: FLT PLAN RELEASE REFLECTED ACFT TO BE IN CAT II STATUS. HOWEVER, DURING OUR LAYOVER, I NOTICED THAT THE MAINT AT LUBBOCK STATION HAD WORKED ON ACFT AND THE LOGBOOK (AND AIRPLANE) WAS IN 'NOT CAT II' STATUS. I DID NOT UPDATE FLT PLAN/RELEASE TO REFLECT IT. WE OPERATED FLT UNDER IFR FLT PLAN, AND VISUAL (VFR) CONDITIONS EXISTED AT OUR DEST. I AM SIMPLY CONCERNED THAT THE PAPERWORK BTWN THE FLT PLAN/RELEASE AND THE ACFT LOG DID NOT AGREE. FLT WAS NORMAL WITH NO INCIDENTS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.