Narrative:

We diverted to ict because of WX at dfw. I tried to send an arrival report but got 'no communication' light on ACARS. 'No communication' light illuminated after all subsequent requests via ACARS. I stayed on aircraft with flight attendants and passenger while captain went in to get new flight plan and tps. We discussed flight plan and tps when captain returned. Then we boarded approximately 30 additional passenger from another flight that had also diverted. Captain went back in to operations to pull new tps which accurately reflected the new passenger count. Because of how much time had elapsed after new passenger, bags and fuel had been added, I figured the new tps the captain pulled would be the equivalent of the standard closeout. Whether the closeout came from the ACARS printer or a computer printer didn't seem to make any difference. Given the unusual circumstances, ie, divert/non company station and no ACARS, this seemed to be a reasonable and safe course of action.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ACR S80 DIVERTED TO ALTERNATE. NO ACARS AVAILABLE FOR PAX FUEL CLOSEOUT. FO USED LAST COMPUTER PRINTOUT, REASONING THAT IT WAS AS CLOSE AS ANYTHING ELSE.

Narrative: WE DIVERTED TO ICT BECAUSE OF WX AT DFW. I TRIED TO SEND AN ARR RPT BUT GOT 'NO COM' LIGHT ON ACARS. 'NO COM' LIGHT ILLUMINATED AFTER ALL SUBSEQUENT REQUESTS VIA ACARS. I STAYED ON ACFT WITH FLT ATTENDANTS AND PAX WHILE CAPT WENT IN TO GET NEW FLT PLAN AND TPS. WE DISCUSSED FLT PLAN AND TPS WHEN CAPT RETURNED. THEN WE BOARDED APPROX 30 ADDITIONAL PAX FROM ANOTHER FLT THAT HAD ALSO DIVERTED. CAPT WENT BACK IN TO OPS TO PULL NEW TPS WHICH ACCURATELY REFLECTED THE NEW PAX COUNT. BECAUSE OF HOW MUCH TIME HAD ELAPSED AFTER NEW PAX, BAGS AND FUEL HAD BEEN ADDED, I FIGURED THE NEW TPS THE CAPT PULLED WOULD BE THE EQUIVALENT OF THE STANDARD CLOSEOUT. WHETHER THE CLOSEOUT CAME FROM THE ACARS PRINTER OR A COMPUTER PRINTER DIDN'T SEEM TO MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE. GIVEN THE UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES, IE, DIVERT/NON COMPANY STATION AND NO ACARS, THIS SEEMED TO BE A REASONABLE AND SAFE COURSE OF ACTION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.