Narrative:

We were cleared via sey 247 degree radial to intercept J174 south of hto. As we approached the airway we dialed in hto (113.6) but mistakenly dialed in 174 degrees rather than 234 degree (radial for J174). Autoplt began a turn to the southeast to intercept the 174 degree radial. We caught our mistake and began a turn back to the west to intercept J174 just as center asked what heading we were on. We replied 150 degrees in a turn. ATC gave us a 250 degree heading to intercept J174. They also advised that this was the third similar incident that month. This seems to be a common mistake that apparently vigilance and situational awareness can overcome. ATC could give us a heading to intercept a radial rather than giving us a radial to intercept another radial, thus we wouldn't have to monitor 2 vors.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MLG ACFT IN CRUISE ON AIRWAYS, RPTR CAPT INADVERTENTLY PUT THE AIRWAY NUMBER IN THE COURSE CHANGE WHICH TOOK ACFT OFF COURSE UNTIL CTLR INTERVENED AND CORRECTED.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED VIA SEY 247 DEG RADIAL TO INTERCEPT J174 S OF HTO. AS WE APCHED THE AIRWAY WE DIALED IN HTO (113.6) BUT MISTAKENLY DIALED IN 174 DEGS RATHER THAN 234 DEG (RADIAL FOR J174). AUTOPLT BEGAN A TURN TO THE SE TO INTERCEPT THE 174 DEG RADIAL. WE CAUGHT OUR MISTAKE AND BEGAN A TURN BACK TO THE W TO INTERCEPT J174 JUST AS CTR ASKED WHAT HEADING WE WERE ON. WE REPLIED 150 DEGS IN A TURN. ATC GAVE US A 250 DEG HDG TO INTERCEPT J174. THEY ALSO ADVISED THAT THIS WAS THE THIRD SIMILAR INCIDENT THAT MONTH. THIS SEEMS TO BE A COMMON MISTAKE THAT APPARENTLY VIGILANCE AND SITUATIONAL AWARENESS CAN OVERCOME. ATC COULD GIVE US A HEADING TO INTERCEPT A RADIAL RATHER THAN GIVING US A RADIAL TO INTERCEPT ANOTHER RADIAL, THUS WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO MONITOR 2 VORS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.