Narrative:

I did not get the latest revision in my mailbox and I did ask the first officer if he had one in his and he said he did not so I thought I was ok. Well there had been one earlier that I did not get. So on the hornet one departure at clt I had the hornet nine. I briefed the turn from runway 36L to 330 degrees at 100 ft. The first officer did not look at his chart at this time but he acknolweged the instructions. Later he looked but we were just powering up cleared for takeoff. So we made the turn at 100 ft instead of 2.5 clt DME. Then later we realized the out of date chart. We discussed how we could avoid a similar problem by both of us verifying the procedure earlier than what we did. The only problem today may have been noise abatement.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: MD80 ACFT ON INITIAL CLB FOR SID DEP, RPTR CAPT HAD OUTDATED SID CHART AND TURNED TO HEADING TOO SOON. PRIOR TO DEP CAPT ASKED FO IF HE HAD THE LATEST REVISION AND HE SAID HE DID NOT.

Narrative: I DID NOT GET THE LATEST REVISION IN MY MAILBOX AND I DID ASK THE FO IF HE HAD ONE IN HIS AND HE SAID HE DID NOT SO I THOUGHT I WAS OK. WELL THERE HAD BEEN ONE EARLIER THAT I DID NOT GET. SO ON THE HORNET ONE DEP AT CLT I HAD THE HORNET NINE. I BRIEFED THE TURN FROM RWY 36L TO 330 DEGS AT 100 FT. THE FO DID NOT LOOK AT HIS CHART AT THIS TIME BUT HE ACKNOLWEGED THE INSTRUCTIONS. LATER HE LOOKED BUT WE WERE JUST POWERING UP CLRED FOR TKOF. SO WE MADE THE TURN AT 100 FT INSTEAD OF 2.5 CLT DME. THEN LATER WE REALIZED THE OUT OF DATE CHART. WE DISCUSSED HOW WE COULD AVOID A SIMILAR PROB BY BOTH OF US VERIFYING THE PROC EARLIER THAN WHAT WE DID. THE ONLY PROB TODAY MAY HAVE BEEN NOISE ABATEMENT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.