37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 408929 |
Time | |
Date | 199804 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : dca |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Helicopter |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | other |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | other personnel other |
Qualification | other other : other |
ASRS Report | 408929 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
During the morning daily aircraft check, it was determined the pilot's ADI was inoperative. My first instinct was it could not be MEL'ed. Further discussions convinced me it could. This was based on the remarks section referring to the standby attitude indicator. The next day another pilot reviewed the logs coming on duty and disagreed with what had been done. We removed an ADI from another aircraft, installed it in affected aircraft so it could be ferried to our main maintenance base so it would not block the helipad until we could get another instrument. I had been working 14 days in a row and the outside air temperature had been above 100 degrees F for several days. I had been pushing myself too long and hard. The master MEL should reference flight instruments by normal industry nomenclature. It can lead to confusion in decision making processes.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A HELI WAS DISPATCHED WITH A DEFERRED LOG RPT ON THE ADI IN CONFLICT WITH THE MEL.
Narrative: DURING THE MORNING DAILY ACFT CHK, IT WAS DETERMINED THE PLT'S ADI WAS INOP. MY FIRST INSTINCT WAS IT COULD NOT BE MEL'ED. FURTHER DISCUSSIONS CONVINCED ME IT COULD. THIS WAS BASED ON THE REMARKS SECTION REFERRING TO THE STANDBY ATTITUDE INDICATOR. THE NEXT DAY ANOTHER PLT REVIEWED THE LOGS COMING ON DUTY AND DISAGREED WITH WHAT HAD BEEN DONE. WE REMOVED AN ADI FROM ANOTHER ACFT, INSTALLED IT IN AFFECTED ACFT SO IT COULD BE FERRIED TO OUR MAIN MAINT BASE SO IT WOULD NOT BLOCK THE HELIPAD UNTIL WE COULD GET ANOTHER INST. I HAD BEEN WORKING 14 DAYS IN A ROW AND THE OUTSIDE AIR TEMP HAD BEEN ABOVE 100 DEGS F FOR SEVERAL DAYS. I HAD BEEN PUSHING MYSELF TOO LONG AND HARD. THE MASTER MEL SHOULD REF FLT INSTS BY NORMAL INDUSTRY NOMENCLATURE. IT CAN LEAD TO CONFUSION IN DECISION MAKING PROCESSES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.