37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 409328 |
Time | |
Date | 199807 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : dtw |
State Reference | MI |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 2100 msl bound upper : 3000 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : dtw tower : psp |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | DC-9 30 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing other other |
Route In Use | approach : visual arrival other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 105 flight time total : 9000 flight time type : 675 |
ASRS Report | 409328 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 55 flight time total : 7300 flight time type : 55 |
ASRS Report | 409138 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : unspecified other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : declared emergency flight crew : overcame equipment problem other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Situations | |
Publication | Unspecified |
Narrative:
On final approach, when landing gear was lowered, the nose gear indicated unsafe. I complied with company operations manual procedures as the first officer flew ATC assigned vectors. First officer attempted to visually confirm gear position through the viewing port under his left foot (as I flew the aircraft) and was unable to confirm a 'down' gear on the first attempt. I had him look again after discussing the visual gear indicator appearance and turning the aircraft to change the lighting angle. He was fairly certain he saw the indicators aligned this time. So we returned to dtw to land. I was talking to dispatch and maintenance this entire time. Maintenance recommended we cycle the gear after the first visual inspection. I did not want to at that time as I knew it was hanging down and the gear doors were closed. (Tower said it appeared down as we flew upwind and we could see ground through the viewing port.) we returned to dtw (with the crash gear standing by) for an uneventful landing. I declared an emergency because the first officer was not 100% certain that he could see the 3 stripes clearly. The 'up lock' stripe on the side of the strut was what confused the first officer. He saw it in addition to (and very near to) the down and locked stripes. Our manual could show clrer, more detail and accurate pictures of this.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A DC9-30 FLC HAS AN UNSAFE GEAR INDICATION AFTER EXTENDING THE GEAR. THEY HAVE SOME DIFFICULTY IN ASCERTAINING THE POS OF THE VISUAL GEAR DOWN INDICATOR BECAUSE OF THE ALIGNMENT OF THE 'UP LOCK' STRIPES VERSUS THE 'DOWN LOCK' STRIPES. PIC SAYS OPS MANUAL PICTURES ARE NOT CLRLY DEPICTED.
Narrative: ON FINAL APCH, WHEN LNDG GEAR WAS LOWERED, THE NOSE GEAR INDICATED UNSAFE. I COMPLIED WITH COMPANY OPS MANUAL PROCS AS THE FO FLEW ATC ASSIGNED VECTORS. FO ATTEMPTED TO VISUALLY CONFIRM GEAR POS THROUGH THE VIEWING PORT UNDER HIS L FOOT (AS I FLEW THE ACFT) AND WAS UNABLE TO CONFIRM A 'DOWN' GEAR ON THE FIRST ATTEMPT. I HAD HIM LOOK AGAIN AFTER DISCUSSING THE VISUAL GEAR INDICATOR APPEARANCE AND TURNING THE ACFT TO CHANGE THE LIGHTING ANGLE. HE WAS FAIRLY CERTAIN HE SAW THE INDICATORS ALIGNED THIS TIME. SO WE RETURNED TO DTW TO LAND. I WAS TALKING TO DISPATCH AND MAINT THIS ENTIRE TIME. MAINT RECOMMENDED WE CYCLE THE GEAR AFTER THE FIRST VISUAL INSPECTION. I DID NOT WANT TO AT THAT TIME AS I KNEW IT WAS HANGING DOWN AND THE GEAR DOORS WERE CLOSED. (TWR SAID IT APPEARED DOWN AS WE FLEW UPWIND AND WE COULD SEE GND THROUGH THE VIEWING PORT.) WE RETURNED TO DTW (WITH THE CRASH GEAR STANDING BY) FOR AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG. I DECLARED AN EMER BECAUSE THE FO WAS NOT 100% CERTAIN THAT HE COULD SEE THE 3 STRIPES CLRLY. THE 'UP LOCK' STRIPE ON THE SIDE OF THE STRUT WAS WHAT CONFUSED THE FO. HE SAW IT IN ADDITION TO (AND VERY NEAR TO) THE DOWN AND LOCKED STRIPES. OUR MANUAL COULD SHOW CLRER, MORE DETAIL AND ACCURATE PICTURES OF THIS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.