Narrative:

ATR had an first officer pitot heat deferred. MEL said no flight into visible moisture. We did not fly into moisture. MEL could be read 'no flight into forecast moisture.' there were a few clouds at 8000 ft scattered, but we stayed clear. Forecast might have been for light rain possible at sgf. Crew next day grounded aircraft due to rain. Company investigating if we flew into moisture. Turn over to FAA may happen. I believe no violation happened. We did not fly in moisture. Forecast and ATIS were visibility 10 mi, 12000 ft broken, wind 230 degrees, 4 KTS, runway 20 at sgf. Stl clear 10 mi visibility, winds calm.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: ATR ACFT CREW ACCEPTED THE ACFT WITH AN INOP FO PITOT HEAT PER MEL. WX WAS MARGINAL FOR THE MEL ITEM.

Narrative: ATR HAD AN FO PITOT HEAT DEFERRED. MEL SAID NO FLT INTO VISIBLE MOISTURE. WE DID NOT FLY INTO MOISTURE. MEL COULD BE READ 'NO FLT INTO FORECAST MOISTURE.' THERE WERE A FEW CLOUDS AT 8000 FT SCATTERED, BUT WE STAYED CLR. FORECAST MIGHT HAVE BEEN FOR LIGHT RAIN POSSIBLE AT SGF. CREW NEXT DAY GNDED ACFT DUE TO RAIN. COMPANY INVESTIGATING IF WE FLEW INTO MOISTURE. TURN OVER TO FAA MAY HAPPEN. I BELIEVE NO VIOLATION HAPPENED. WE DID NOT FLY IN MOISTURE. FORECAST AND ATIS WERE VISIBILITY 10 MI, 12000 FT BROKEN, WIND 230 DEGS, 4 KTS, RWY 20 AT SGF. STL CLR 10 MI VISIBILITY, WINDS CALM.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.