Narrative:

After conducting a training flight, I discovered that the aircraft I had flown had exceeded its 100 hour inspection requirement as well as (2?) airworthiness directives. The problem occurred as a result of the fact that the aircraft originally scheduled for the flight in question was 'down' for maintenance and the aircraft I flew was a last min substitute. The aircraft status board, where maintenance records are kept, had not been updated and because the aircraft I flew was infrequently used, I did not check the status of the required 100 hour inspection and airworthiness directives. Obviously, a closer check of the maintenance records will remedy this problem. Furthermore, an employee is now updating the maintenance board on a daily basis and monitoring the status of our compliance with all applicable maintenance requirements.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: INSTRUCTOR PLT FOR A FLYING SCHOOL CONDUCTED TRAINING IN A C152 WHEN THE 100 HR AND 2 AIRWORTHINESS INSPECTIONS WERE OVERDUE.

Narrative: AFTER CONDUCTING A TRAINING FLT, I DISCOVERED THAT THE ACFT I HAD FLOWN HAD EXCEEDED ITS 100 HR INSPECTION REQUIREMENT AS WELL AS (2?) AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES. THE PROB OCCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE FACT THAT THE ACFT ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR THE FLT IN QUESTION WAS 'DOWN' FOR MAINT AND THE ACFT I FLEW WAS A LAST MIN SUBSTITUTE. THE ACFT STATUS BOARD, WHERE MAINT RECORDS ARE KEPT, HAD NOT BEEN UPDATED AND BECAUSE THE ACFT I FLEW WAS INFREQUENTLY USED, I DID NOT CHK THE STATUS OF THE REQUIRED 100 HR INSPECTION AND AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES. OBVIOUSLY, A CLOSER CHK OF THE MAINT RECORDS WILL REMEDY THIS PROB. FURTHERMORE, AN EMPLOYEE IS NOW UPDATING THE MAINT BOARD ON A DAILY BASIS AND MONITORING THE STATUS OF OUR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE MAINT REQUIREMENTS.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.