Narrative:

We were cleared for a visual approach to runway 18R at mco. We used the ILS runway 18R as a backup for vertical guidance. We were cleared to maintain 2500 ft until the orl VOR. I mistakenly thought that following the GS would comply with the ATC instructions. However, the GS crosses the VOR at about 2100 ft. This put us 400 ft low. I feel a contributing factor was the crew were all tired having flown all night to get to this point. This procedure seems unsafe in that they expect us to deliberately fly 400 ft high on this approach and then dive back down to a proper glide path. It makes for a very unstabilized approach with excessive descent rates near the ground. We should be allowed to fly the GS during this visual approach. This is especially true in transport category aircraft where a stabilized approach leads to a safer approach.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B727 FLC FAILED TO MAINTAIN ASSIGNED ALT PRIOR TO BEGINNING APCH INTO MCO.

Narrative: WE WERE CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 18R AT MCO. WE USED THE ILS RWY 18R AS A BACKUP FOR VERT GUIDANCE. WE WERE CLRED TO MAINTAIN 2500 FT UNTIL THE ORL VOR. I MISTAKENLY THOUGHT THAT FOLLOWING THE GS WOULD COMPLY WITH THE ATC INSTRUCTIONS. HOWEVER, THE GS CROSSES THE VOR AT ABOUT 2100 FT. THIS PUT US 400 FT LOW. I FEEL A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR WAS THE CREW WERE ALL TIRED HAVING FLOWN ALL NIGHT TO GET TO THIS POINT. THIS PROC SEEMS UNSAFE IN THAT THEY EXPECT US TO DELIBERATELY FLY 400 FT HIGH ON THIS APCH AND THEN DIVE BACK DOWN TO A PROPER GLIDE PATH. IT MAKES FOR A VERY UNSTABILIZED APCH WITH EXCESSIVE DSCNT RATES NEAR THE GND. WE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO FLY THE GS DURING THIS VISUAL APCH. THIS IS ESPECIALLY TRUE IN TRANSPORT CATEGORY ACFT WHERE A STABILIZED APCH LEADS TO A SAFER APCH.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.