37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 428030 |
Time | |
Date | 199902 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ord.airport |
State Reference | IL |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Weather Elements | Windshear |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : ord.tower tower : slc.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 27l |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : navigator oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 230 flight time total : 23000 flight time type : 230 |
ASRS Report | 428030 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather |
Resolutory Action | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Weather |
Primary Problem | Weather |
Narrative:
While on the ILS approach to runway 27L at ord, inside the OM., we were advised by ord tower of a windshear report by a previous aircraft and, I believe, he may have mentioned a previous microburst alert, rather than a current one. (My first officer's recollection was a windshear alert, not a microburst alert.) on that basis, we continued our approach and landed as cleared. Our experience throughout the approach was speed fluctuations not exceeding +/-5 KTS. A normal landing and rollout followed. I'm submitting this report because, in hindsight, I have a nagging concern that I may have misunderstood the tower and perhaps should have made a missed approach. While my workload at the time was rather high, as the PF, I feel I should have pushed harder for clarification. (Communications confusion.)
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: WDB CREW WAS GIVEN WINDSHEAR WARNINGS WHILE ON FINAL AT ORD.
Narrative: WHILE ON THE ILS APCH TO RWY 27L AT ORD, INSIDE THE OM., WE WERE ADVISED BY ORD TWR OF A WINDSHEAR RPT BY A PREVIOUS ACFT AND, I BELIEVE, HE MAY HAVE MENTIONED A PREVIOUS MICROBURST ALERT, RATHER THAN A CURRENT ONE. (MY FO'S RECOLLECTION WAS A WINDSHEAR ALERT, NOT A MICROBURST ALERT.) ON THAT BASIS, WE CONTINUED OUR APCH AND LANDED AS CLRED. OUR EXPERIENCE THROUGHOUT THE APCH WAS SPD FLUCTUATIONS NOT EXCEEDING +/-5 KTS. A NORMAL LNDG AND ROLLOUT FOLLOWED. I'M SUBMITTING THIS RPT BECAUSE, IN HINDSIGHT, I HAVE A NAGGING CONCERN THAT I MAY HAVE MISUNDERSTOOD THE TWR AND PERHAPS SHOULD HAVE MADE A MISSED APCH. WHILE MY WORKLOAD AT THE TIME WAS RATHER HIGH, AS THE PF, I FEEL I SHOULD HAVE PUSHED HARDER FOR CLARIFICATION. (COMS CONFUSION.)
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.