Narrative:

I allowed the first officer (PF) to get above the correct glide path. He made a proper correction to get back on the path, but the GPWS was triggered and commanded an aural and visual pull-up. We were still quite high (1000-1200 ft) and I allowed him to continue the approach because he corrected to a slower descent and the GPWS was back to normal. A safe and normal landing was made. Unfortunately, the inexperienced lead flight attendant heard the 'pull-up' and began shouting to the passenger to get in the crash position. Next time, I'm giving the go around command! Not because I felt the final approach and landing unsafe, but my crew and passenger were put under duress for a short period of time.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A DC9 CAPT ALLOWS THE FO TO GET INTO A DESTABILIZED APCH WHICH SETS OFF THE GPWS DUE TO THE HIGH SINK RATE ESTABLISHED TO REACQUIRE THE ILS GS. THE INEXPERIENCED LEAD FLT ATTENDANT, UPON HEARING THE GPWS WARNING, SHOUTS TO THE PAX TO GET INTO A 'CRASH POS.' CAPT ALLOWS APCH TO CONTINUE TO LNDG.

Narrative: I ALLOWED THE FO (PF) TO GET ABOVE THE CORRECT GLIDE PATH. HE MADE A PROPER CORRECTION TO GET BACK ON THE PATH, BUT THE GPWS WAS TRIGGERED AND COMMANDED AN AURAL AND VISUAL PULL-UP. WE WERE STILL QUITE HIGH (1000-1200 FT) AND I ALLOWED HIM TO CONTINUE THE APCH BECAUSE HE CORRECTED TO A SLOWER DSCNT AND THE GPWS WAS BACK TO NORMAL. A SAFE AND NORMAL LNDG WAS MADE. UNFORTUNATELY, THE INEXPERIENCED LEAD FLT ATTENDANT HEARD THE 'PULL-UP' AND BEGAN SHOUTING TO THE PAX TO GET IN THE CRASH POS. NEXT TIME, I'M GIVING THE GAR COMMAND! NOT BECAUSE I FELT THE FINAL APCH AND LNDG UNSAFE, BUT MY CREW AND PAX WERE PUT UNDER DURESS FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.