Narrative:

After climbing out on a 170 degree runway heading, pns departure gave us a left turn to 010 degrees. Approximately 1/2 way through the turn at 30 degree bank, pns departure gave us a TA, T34 acrobatic, 4 mi east at 5100 ft. TCASII gave us an RA to monitor vertical speed at less than 300 FPM climb. First officer spotted traffic at 2-3 O'clock, 300 ft high, 1 mi. TCASII gave us a clear of conflict and we continued climb on 010 degree heading. If I had not been in a 30 degree bank turn, the separation would have been much closer. The first officer used to be a navy training pilot and said the T34L was in area 3. Why would pns departure vector us into an active training area towards a known target to set up a potential midair collision?

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737-400 VECTORED INTO CONFLICT WITH MIL ACFT NEAR PNS.

Narrative: AFTER CLBING OUT ON A 170 DEG RWY HDG, PNS DEP GAVE US A L TURN TO 010 DEGS. APPROX 1/2 WAY THROUGH THE TURN AT 30 DEG BANK, PNS DEP GAVE US A TA, T34 ACROBATIC, 4 MI E AT 5100 FT. TCASII GAVE US AN RA TO MONITOR VERT SPD AT LESS THAN 300 FPM CLB. FO SPOTTED TFC AT 2-3 O'CLOCK, 300 FT HIGH, 1 MI. TCASII GAVE US A CLR OF CONFLICT AND WE CONTINUED CLB ON 010 DEG HDG. IF I HAD NOT BEEN IN A 30 DEG BANK TURN, THE SEPARATION WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH CLOSER. THE FO USED TO BE A NAVY TRAINING PLT AND SAID THE T34L WAS IN AREA 3. WHY WOULD PNS DEP VECTOR US INTO AN ACTIVE TRAINING AREA TOWARDS A KNOWN TARGET TO SET UP A POTENTIAL MIDAIR COLLISION?

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.