37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 450520 |
Time | |
Date | 199909 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bos.airport |
State Reference | MA |
Altitude | msl single value : 1000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : a90.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757-200 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Route In Use | departure sid : n/s |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 20000 flight time type : 2300 |
ASRS Report | 450520 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance controller : issued alert none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Runway 9 was the departure runway but because of weight and performance numbers, I requested runway 4R. Approval was given before taxiing to runway 9. Because of landing traffic on runway 4R, clearance to take off was given rather quickly. All checks were done with ample time, but because of the runway change, we understood we were to fly the runway heading, and we did. After takeoff departure control said they had expected us to fly the original SID, which called for a right turn. No conflicts or other problems were encountered and we were given a left turn on course. That was the end of the situation. My recommendation: when there is a runway change, the tower should restate the desired departure instructions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B757 CREW HAD TRACK DEV AT BOS.
Narrative: RWY 9 WAS THE DEP RWY BUT BECAUSE OF WT AND PERFORMANCE NUMBERS, I REQUESTED RWY 4R. APPROVAL WAS GIVEN BEFORE TAXIING TO RWY 9. BECAUSE OF LNDG TFC ON RWY 4R, CLRNC TO TAKE OFF WAS GIVEN RATHER QUICKLY. ALL CHKS WERE DONE WITH AMPLE TIME, BUT BECAUSE OF THE RWY CHANGE, WE UNDERSTOOD WE WERE TO FLY THE RWY HEADING, AND WE DID. AFTER TKOF DEP CTL SAID THEY HAD EXPECTED US TO FLY THE ORIGINAL SID, WHICH CALLED FOR A R TURN. NO CONFLICTS OR OTHER PROBS WERE ENCOUNTERED AND WE WERE GIVEN A L TURN ON COURSE. THAT WAS THE END OF THE SIT. MY RECOMMENDATION: WHEN THERE IS A RWY CHANGE, THE TWR SHOULD RESTATE THE DESIRED DEP INSTRUCTIONS.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.