37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 458341 |
Time | |
Date | 199912 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : lax.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | msl single value : 2200 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : lax.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | DC-10 40 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 24r |
Flight Phase | descent : approach descent : vacating altitude |
Route In Use | approach : visual arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 162 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 185 |
ASRS Report | 458341 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : ils localizer indicator other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued alert flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Weather |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Socal approach assigned a 070 degree heading after smo VORTAC, descent from 7000 ft to 4000 ft while on radar downwind for runway 24R at lax. First officer was flying, I was captain and all 3 pilots were tired due to flying all night. WX was good, however, strong santa ana conditions were drifting us towards the landing runway. Just prior to abeam position to romen, approach cleared us for a visual approach, instructed us to turn base within 1 mi, informed us that we had traffic at our 1 O'clock position for the south complex, and directed us to contact tower. At the time we were descending through 5500 ft MSL and I felt we were too high to safely complete the approach. I told the first officer I thought he was 'too high', but failed to insist that he extend the downwind. All 3 of us were so preoccupied with monitoring the steep descent and looking for our traffic (which we never spotted) that we did not realize that we had completely overshot the north complex and were perfectly aligned to land on runway 25R. This occurred even though we had tuned, idented and selected the ILS for runway 24R. We didn't realize the mistake until lax tower queried us if we were going to 'correct north.' we still had enough distance to correct back towards runway 24R and the tower ultimately cleared us to land on runway 24L. Fatigue, lack of situational awareness (high altitude, strong drift), distraction (looking for traffic) and poor leadership (I should have insisted that we extend the downwind) contributed to this error. Good WX and lack of proximate traffic prevented this error from becoming a disaster.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLC OF A DC10-40 OVERSHOT FINAL DURING A VISUAL APCH DUE TO A STRONG XWIND ON BASE LEG. TWR CTLR ALERTED THEM TO THEIR ERROR.
Narrative: SOCAL APCH ASSIGNED A 070 DEG HDG AFTER SMO VORTAC, DSCNT FROM 7000 FT TO 4000 FT WHILE ON RADAR DOWNWIND FOR RWY 24R AT LAX. FO WAS FLYING, I WAS CAPT AND ALL 3 PLTS WERE TIRED DUE TO FLYING ALL NIGHT. WX WAS GOOD, HOWEVER, STRONG SANTA ANA CONDITIONS WERE DRIFTING US TOWARDS THE LNDG RWY. JUST PRIOR TO ABEAM POS TO ROMEN, APCH CLRED US FOR A VISUAL APCH, INSTRUCTED US TO TURN BASE WITHIN 1 MI, INFORMED US THAT WE HAD TFC AT OUR 1 O'CLOCK POS FOR THE S COMPLEX, AND DIRECTED US TO CONTACT TWR. AT THE TIME WE WERE DSNDING THROUGH 5500 FT MSL AND I FELT WE WERE TOO HIGH TO SAFELY COMPLETE THE APCH. I TOLD THE FO I THOUGHT HE WAS 'TOO HIGH', BUT FAILED TO INSIST THAT HE EXTEND THE DOWNWIND. ALL 3 OF US WERE SO PREOCCUPIED WITH MONITORING THE STEEP DSCNT AND LOOKING FOR OUR TFC (WHICH WE NEVER SPOTTED) THAT WE DID NOT REALIZE THAT WE HAD COMPLETELY OVERSHOT THE N COMPLEX AND WERE PERFECTLY ALIGNED TO LAND ON RWY 25R. THIS OCCURRED EVEN THOUGH WE HAD TUNED, IDENTED AND SELECTED THE ILS FOR RWY 24R. WE DIDN'T REALIZE THE MISTAKE UNTIL LAX TWR QUERIED US IF WE WERE GOING TO 'CORRECT N.' WE STILL HAD ENOUGH DISTANCE TO CORRECT BACK TOWARDS RWY 24R AND THE TWR ULTIMATELY CLRED US TO LAND ON RWY 24L. FATIGUE, LACK OF SITUATIONAL AWARENESS (HIGH ALT, STRONG DRIFT), DISTR (LOOKING FOR TFC) AND POOR LEADERSHIP (I SHOULD HAVE INSISTED THAT WE EXTEND THE DOWNWIND) CONTRIBUTED TO THIS ERROR. GOOD WX AND LACK OF PROXIMATE TFC PREVENTED THIS ERROR FROM BECOMING A DISASTER.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.