Narrative:

In atl (where the natca safety representative says they don't just bend, but rather break the rules) we were on a visual approach to the runway. We did not call traffic in sight because we didn't want our spacing reduced to 2 NM while accepting all responsibility and knew that we would probably lose sight on the traffic once we were both on glide path. We were chided by the controller for not calling traffic. 'What? Are there clouds out there?' and finally sent around because we didn't call it in sight. This game of circumventing mandatory wake turbulence separation in the name of capacity is a dangerous one with potentially grave consequences.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CTLR SENDS B757 AROUND WHEN CREW WILL NOT CALL PRECEDING ACFT IN SIGHT FOR A VISUAL SEPARATION ACCOUNT VISIBILITY CONCERNS.

Narrative: IN ATL (WHERE THE NATCA SAFETY REPRESENTATIVE SAYS THEY DON'T JUST BEND, BUT RATHER BREAK THE RULES) WE WERE ON A VISUAL APCH TO THE RWY. WE DID NOT CALL TFC IN SIGHT BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT OUR SPACING REDUCED TO 2 NM WHILE ACCEPTING ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND KNEW THAT WE WOULD PROBABLY LOSE SIGHT ON THE TFC ONCE WE WERE BOTH ON GLIDE PATH. WE WERE CHIDED BY THE CTLR FOR NOT CALLING TFC. 'WHAT? ARE THERE CLOUDS OUT THERE?' AND FINALLY SENT AROUND BECAUSE WE DIDN'T CALL IT IN SIGHT. THIS GAME OF CIRCUMVENTING MANDATORY WAKE TURB SEPARATION IN THE NAME OF CAPACITY IS A DANGEROUS ONE WITH POTENTIALLY GRAVE CONSEQUENCES.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.