37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 465503 |
Time | |
Date | 200002 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-88 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time total : 16000 flight time type : 7000 |
ASRS Report | 465503 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : far non adherence : company policies non adherence : published procedure other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : 3 |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft FAA Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
As I was about to perform my walkaround inspection prior to flight, I was met by an FAA inspector who made a comment about the oil on the bottom side of the #2 engine nacelle. I told him I'd take a look at it. Upon inspection of that area, I did notice some oil. However, in my judgement and experience I did not believe it to be excessive. Upon completion of the walkaround, I spoke with the inspector again who asked what the oil consumption was on the previous flight (about 4 hours). I informed him that it was normal. The inspector then commented, 'you may want to have your people look at that when you get back.' this was referring to our home maintenance base. I said I would. Returning to the aircraft, I checked the maintenance log to see how much and when oil had been added to #2 engine. Nothing abnormal noted. Our company now directs us to write up any item that an FAA inspector mentions in any way and then allow maintenance control to determine the course of action to be taken.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MD80. FAA ACI POINTED OUT A POSSIBLE OIL LEAK TO THE CAPT.
Narrative: AS I WAS ABOUT TO PERFORM MY WALKAROUND INSPECTION PRIOR TO FLT, I WAS MET BY AN FAA INSPECTOR WHO MADE A COMMENT ABOUT THE OIL ON THE BOTTOM SIDE OF THE #2 ENG NACELLE. I TOLD HIM I'D TAKE A LOOK AT IT. UPON INSPECTION OF THAT AREA, I DID NOTICE SOME OIL. HOWEVER, IN MY JUDGEMENT AND EXPERIENCE I DID NOT BELIEVE IT TO BE EXCESSIVE. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WALKAROUND, I SPOKE WITH THE INSPECTOR AGAIN WHO ASKED WHAT THE OIL CONSUMPTION WAS ON THE PREVIOUS FLT (ABOUT 4 HRS). I INFORMED HIM THAT IT WAS NORMAL. THE INSPECTOR THEN COMMENTED, 'YOU MAY WANT TO HAVE YOUR PEOPLE LOOK AT THAT WHEN YOU GET BACK.' THIS WAS REFERRING TO OUR HOME MAINT BASE. I SAID I WOULD. RETURNING TO THE ACFT, I CHKED THE MAINT LOG TO SEE HOW MUCH AND WHEN OIL HAD BEEN ADDED TO #2 ENG. NOTHING ABNORMAL NOTED. OUR COMPANY NOW DIRECTS US TO WRITE UP ANY ITEM THAT AN FAA INSPECTOR MENTIONS IN ANY WAY AND THEN ALLOW MAINT CTL TO DETERMINE THE COURSE OF ACTION TO BE TAKEN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.