37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 475590 |
Time | |
Date | 200006 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : tol.airport |
State Reference | OH |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dawn |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65, Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 90 flight time total : 3600 flight time type : 90 |
ASRS Report | 475590 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine |
Events | |
Anomaly | maintenance problem : non compliance with mel |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
My crew and I flew an aircraft back to base the morning of jun/fri/00. The flight was a scheduled passenger flight operated under 121 flight rules. It has been brought to my attention that there may have been an expired MEL (deferral) item for the aircraft we flew. If that is the case, we unknowingly and inadvertently flew the aircraft illegally. I believe that the crew and I were aware of all MEL items and I reviewed and briefed all known deferrals. In the future, I will be especially vigilant when reviewing an aircraft's maintenance history/logbook.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR CREW TOLD THEY MAY HAVE FLOWN AN ACFT IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH MEL.
Narrative: MY CREW AND I FLEW AN ACFT BACK TO BASE THE MORNING OF JUN/FRI/00. THE FLT WAS A SCHEDULED PAX FLT OPERATED UNDER 121 FLT RULES. IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO MY ATTN THAT THERE MAY HAVE BEEN AN EXPIRED MEL (DEFERRAL) ITEM FOR THE ACFT WE FLEW. IF THAT IS THE CASE, WE UNKNOWINGLY AND INADVERTENTLY FLEW THE ACFT ILLEGALLY. I BELIEVE THAT THE CREW AND I WERE AWARE OF ALL MEL ITEMS AND I REVIEWED AND BRIEFED ALL KNOWN DEFERRALS. IN THE FUTURE, I WILL BE ESPECIALLY VIGILANT WHEN REVIEWING AN ACFT'S MAINT HISTORY/LOGBOOK.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.