Narrative:

During preflight, I discovered an RMI fire, after aircraft/avionics were pwred. Conversation with local contract maintenance only reiterated what I could see. I troubleshot the problem to the best of my ability (not a mechanic) and called company maintenance control. I described the situation and suggested that the problem was the #2 compass. We examined the MEL and maintenance control assured me that our procedures and the discrepancy allowed for the aircraft to be flown. I flew the aircraft on 3 consecutive legs with no incidents. Later on, I was told that the aircraft was indeed not airworthy and that I had flown it illegally. The problem: I relied on 'experts' to determine the airworthiness of the aircraft.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: A B727 DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH A #2 COMPASS SYS MALFUNCTION DEFERRED AS INOP IN CONFLICT WITH THE MEL.

Narrative: DURING PREFLT, I DISCOVERED AN RMI FIRE, AFTER ACFT/AVIONICS WERE PWRED. CONVERSATION WITH LCL CONTRACT MAINT ONLY REITERATED WHAT I COULD SEE. I TROUBLESHOT THE PROB TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY (NOT A MECH) AND CALLED COMPANY MAINT CTL. I DESCRIBED THE SIT AND SUGGESTED THAT THE PROB WAS THE #2 COMPASS. WE EXAMINED THE MEL AND MAINT CTL ASSURED ME THAT OUR PROCS AND THE DISCREPANCY ALLOWED FOR THE ACFT TO BE FLOWN. I FLEW THE ACFT ON 3 CONSECUTIVE LEGS WITH NO INCIDENTS. LATER ON, I WAS TOLD THAT THE ACFT WAS INDEED NOT AIRWORTHY AND THAT I HAD FLOWN IT ILLEGALLY. THE PROB: I RELIED ON 'EXPERTS' TO DETERMINE THE AIRWORTHINESS OF THE ACFT.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.