37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 493002 |
Time | |
Date | 200011 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B727 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance ground : parked ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 75 flight time total : 6800 flight time type : 1825 |
ASRS Report | 493002 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper documentation maintenance problem : improper maintenance maintenance problem : non compliance with mel non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : fault isolation |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Chart Or Publication Flight Crew Human Performance Maintenance Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
During preflight, I discovered an RMI fire, after aircraft/avionics were pwred. Conversation with local contract maintenance only reiterated what I could see. I troubleshot the problem to the best of my ability (not a mechanic) and called company maintenance control. I described the situation and suggested that the problem was the #2 compass. We examined the MEL and maintenance control assured me that our procedures and the discrepancy allowed for the aircraft to be flown. I flew the aircraft on 3 consecutive legs with no incidents. Later on, I was told that the aircraft was indeed not airworthy and that I had flown it illegally. The problem: I relied on 'experts' to determine the airworthiness of the aircraft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B727 DISPATCHED IN NON COMPLIANCE WITH A #2 COMPASS SYS MALFUNCTION DEFERRED AS INOP IN CONFLICT WITH THE MEL.
Narrative: DURING PREFLT, I DISCOVERED AN RMI FIRE, AFTER ACFT/AVIONICS WERE PWRED. CONVERSATION WITH LCL CONTRACT MAINT ONLY REITERATED WHAT I COULD SEE. I TROUBLESHOT THE PROB TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY (NOT A MECH) AND CALLED COMPANY MAINT CTL. I DESCRIBED THE SIT AND SUGGESTED THAT THE PROB WAS THE #2 COMPASS. WE EXAMINED THE MEL AND MAINT CTL ASSURED ME THAT OUR PROCS AND THE DISCREPANCY ALLOWED FOR THE ACFT TO BE FLOWN. I FLEW THE ACFT ON 3 CONSECUTIVE LEGS WITH NO INCIDENTS. LATER ON, I WAS TOLD THAT THE ACFT WAS INDEED NOT AIRWORTHY AND THAT I HAD FLOWN IT ILLEGALLY. THE PROB: I RELIED ON 'EXPERTS' TO DETERMINE THE AIRWORTHINESS OF THE ACFT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.