E145 crew had runway incursion at oma.

Attributes
ACN	496381
Time
Date	200012
Day	Sat
Local Time Of Day	1801 To 2400
Place
Locale Reference	airport : oma.airport
State Reference	NE
Altitude	agl single value : 0
Environment
Flight Conditions	VMC
Light	Night
Aircraft 1
Operator	common carrier : air carrier
Make Model Name	EMB ERJ 145 ER&LR
Operating Under FAR Part	Part 121
Flight Phase	ground : taxi
Flight Plan	IFR
Person 1
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : captain oversight : pic
Qualification	pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : atp pilot : cfi pilot : multi engine
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 80 flight time total : 15000 flight time type : 600
ASRS Report	496381
Person 2
Affiliation	company : air carrier
Function	flight crew : first officer
Qualification	pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : atp pilot : instrument
Experience	flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 2400 flight time type : 150
ASRS Report	496085
Events
Anomaly	incursion : runway non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far non adherence : clearance non adherence : company policies other anomaly other
Independent Detector	other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb
Resolutory Action	none taken : detected after the fact
Supplementary
Problem Areas	Flight Crew Human Performance
Primary Problem	Flight Crew Human Performance
Air Traffic Incident	Pilot Deviation

Narrative:

Received taxi instructions to runway 36. Mistook active runway for runway 32L and crossed runway 36 without clearance. Was advised of crossing runway 36, but was given amended instructions to taxi to runway 32L for departure. No confusion on my or ATC's part. I just taxied to the wrong runway (32L) and crossed the active and instructed departure runway 36. Yellow caution lights (runway threshold) were operating properly. Supplemental information from acn 496085: captain and I concurred on new takeoff runway 36, then got clearance to take off from ground on runway 32L. As we taxied we thought we were crossing runway 32R but crossed runway 32L (the runway) we were to take off from. Then cleared to runway 36 and take off. No further issue. Expected runway 36 from ATIS, got runway 32L, then were still discussing runway 36.

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: E145 CREW HAD RWY INCURSION AT OMA.

Narrative: RECEIVED TAXI INSTRUCTIONS TO RWY 36. MISTOOK ACTIVE RWY FOR RWY 32L AND CROSSED RWY 36 WITHOUT CLRNC. WAS ADVISED OF XING RWY 36, BUT WAS GIVEN AMENDED INSTRUCTIONS TO TAXI TO RWY 32L FOR DEP. NO CONFUSION ON MY OR ATC'S PART. I JUST TAXIED TO THE WRONG RWY (32L) AND CROSSED THE ACTIVE AND INSTRUCTED DEP RWY 36. YELLOW CAUTION LIGHTS (RWY THRESHOLD) WERE OPERATING PROPERLY. SUPPLEMENTAL INFO FROM ACN 496085: CAPT AND I CONCURRED ON NEW TKOF RWY 36, THEN GOT CLRNC TO TAKE OFF FROM GND ON RWY 32L. AS WE TAXIED WE THOUGHT WE WERE XING RWY 32R BUT CROSSED RWY 32L (THE RWY) WE WERE TO TAKE OFF FROM. THEN CLRED TO RWY 36 AND TAKE OFF. NO FURTHER ISSUE. EXPECTED RWY 36 FROM ATIS, GOT RWY 32L, THEN WERE STILL DISCUSSING RWY 36.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.