37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 520471 |
Time | |
Date | 200108 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | intersection : miget |
State Reference | PA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 29000 msl bound upper : 30500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Route In Use | enroute airway : j146.airway |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 18000 flight time type : 2400 |
ASRS Report | 520471 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : radar other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
We were at FL250 awaiting clearance to our final cruising altitude of FL330. We received a clearance to FL310 and acknowledged same. As we passed through FL305, the controller instructed us to maintain FL310. We acknowledged climbing to FL310. At FL310 the controller advised us that we were supposed to be at FL290. We received and acknowledged a clearance to FL290 and began our descent. We mentioned that we had been cleared to and had read back FL310 and then asked if there was a dispute over our altitude. The controller's response was 'no harm, no foul.' we chose to leave it at that and observed that during the event there was no apparent traffic conflict. During our time in this sector, the controller sounded somewhat fatigued. Other than that and the fact that FL310 was wrong way, I don't know what might have caused us to question the clearance. It's not unusual to receive a wrong way flight level temporarily on our way to our final cruising altitude.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZOB CTLR RECOGNIZES WRONG ALT ASSIGNED AS ACR CLBS THROUGH INTENDED ALT.
Narrative: WE WERE AT FL250 AWAITING CLRNC TO OUR FINAL CRUISING ALT OF FL330. WE RECEIVED A CLRNC TO FL310 AND ACKNOWLEDGED SAME. AS WE PASSED THROUGH FL305, THE CTLR INSTRUCTED US TO MAINTAIN FL310. WE ACKNOWLEDGED CLBING TO FL310. AT FL310 THE CTLR ADVISED US THAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE AT FL290. WE RECEIVED AND ACKNOWLEDGED A CLRNC TO FL290 AND BEGAN OUR DSCNT. WE MENTIONED THAT WE HAD BEEN CLRED TO AND HAD READ BACK FL310 AND THEN ASKED IF THERE WAS A DISPUTE OVER OUR ALT. THE CTLR'S RESPONSE WAS 'NO HARM, NO FOUL.' WE CHOSE TO LEAVE IT AT THAT AND OBSERVED THAT DURING THE EVENT THERE WAS NO APPARENT TFC CONFLICT. DURING OUR TIME IN THIS SECTOR, THE CTLR SOUNDED SOMEWHAT FATIGUED. OTHER THAN THAT AND THE FACT THAT FL310 WAS WRONG WAY, I DON'T KNOW WHAT MIGHT HAVE CAUSED US TO QUESTION THE CLRNC. IT'S NOT UNUSUAL TO RECEIVE A WRONG WAY FLT LEVEL TEMPORARILY ON OUR WAY TO OUR FINAL CRUISING ALT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.