37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 529133 |
Time | |
Date | 200110 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | msl single value : 3500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 15.5 flight time total : 145 flight time type : 91 |
ASRS Report | 529133 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical conflict : ground critical ground encounters : vehicle non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
This incident occurred on oct/xa/01 and involved a fuel starvation engine out landing on interstate xx, in a C172. There was no injury to persons nor was there any damage to any property. It is my understanding that the aircraft involved also sustained no damage at all and was returned to service within a few days after the occurrence. WX was not a factor as it was a beautiful day with clear skies, and minimal surface winds. Forecast winds at lower altitudes were generally out of the southwest. The planned flight was round trip from ZZZ airport direct to ZZZ1 airport departing at XA00 and direct back to ZZZ that afternoon at XJ00. I performed thorough preflight planning which included weight and balance, computation of wind, ground speed and estimated times en route for each leg of the flight. My preflight planning determined that the flight from ZZZ to ZZZ1 would take just under 2 hours. I calculated the return flight to take 1 hour 40 mins. Therefore, I calculated the entire round trip to take 3 hours 40 mins. I generally plan fuel burn conservatively in the C172, which carries 40 gallons of usable fuel. I plan for a fuel burn of 9 gph. Thus, at a conservative 9 gph fuel burn, I should have had 4 hours 24 mins worth of fuel on board. The flight was in a rented C172N with 2 21.5 gallon fuel tanks with approximately 40 usable gallons. Prior to departure, I performed a thorough preflight inspection of the entire aircraft. During the course of the preflight, I visually checked both wing tanks and found the right tank full to the point of almost spilling out and the left tank full to the fuel tank collar. The actual leg from ZZZ to ZZZ1 took just under 2 hours, as planned. Fuel burn should have been a total of about 18 gallons for the first leg, which would have left about 22 gallons (2 hours 24 mins) of fuel remaining for the return flight, which I planned would take about 1 hour 40 mins due to the tailwind. I calculated that I would have about 45 mins of reserve fuel upon completion of the trip back at ZZZ. The return flight began uneventfully, leveling off at 3500 ft MSL to take advantage of stronger winds. Approximately 1 hour 25 mins into the flight, 10 mi southwest of the town of ZZZ2, the engine stopped. Out of habit I pitched up for 70 KTS and before I was able to try and restart the plane, it started on its own. ZZZ2 airport was less than 2 mi northeast of town and with the engine running again I made a determination to put down there to determine the cause of the engine failure. Less than 10 seconds after engine quit the first time it stopped again. I pushed in the mixture and the plane restarted for the second time. The engine seemed to start and stop at least 7 times at which time it would not restart. With less than 2500 ft AGL, I determined we could not make the field and immediately started looking for a suitable landing site. I could not find a large enough field that I felt comfortable setting the plane down on, yet a large 4-LANE highway lay less than 2 mi ahead. Approaching interstate highway xx, my first thought was to land with the traffic heading wbound but I saw too many sets of power lines. I turned right and with a slight tailwind set up to land with the traffic heading eastbound. I landed in the fast lane of eastbound traffic, setting down with the stall horn blaring. At what seemed like 25-30 KTS, I moved the plane into the grass median to avoid any approaching traffic from the rear. I certainly cannot explain why the aircraft ran out of fuel after only flying 3.5 hours, when it should have had a solid hour of fuel remaining in the tanks. The only explanations I can offer are the following: 1) the aircraft had some type of fuel leak, or 2) the aircraft was burning far more fuel than is specified in the aircraft flight manual/pilot handbook. In terms of things that could have been done to prevent the occurrence, I could have manually checked the fuel tanks while in ZZZ1 before making the return flight with a fuel indicator tube. This may have indicated a possible fuel leak or unusually high fuel burn on that leg. I did not do this because I visually verified that we had full fuel tanks upon leaving ZZZ and my preflight planning determined that we shouldhave had about 45 mins of fuel remaining upon the completion of the flight back at ZZZ.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A LOW TIME PVT PLT LANDS HIS C172 ON AN INTERSTATE HWY WHEN THE ENG STOPS DUE TO FUEL EXHAUSTION.
Narrative: THIS INCIDENT OCCURRED ON OCT/XA/01 AND INVOLVED A FUEL STARVATION ENG OUT LNDG ON INTERSTATE XX, IN A C172. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO PERSONS NOR WAS THERE ANY DAMAGE TO ANY PROPERTY. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE ACFT INVOLVED ALSO SUSTAINED NO DAMAGE AT ALL AND WAS RETURNED TO SVC WITHIN A FEW DAYS AFTER THE OCCURRENCE. WX WAS NOT A FACTOR AS IT WAS A BEAUTIFUL DAY WITH CLR SKIES, AND MINIMAL SURFACE WINDS. FORECAST WINDS AT LOWER ALTS WERE GENERALLY OUT OF THE SW. THE PLANNED FLT WAS ROUND TRIP FROM ZZZ ARPT DIRECT TO ZZZ1 ARPT DEPARTING AT XA00 AND DIRECT BACK TO ZZZ THAT AFTERNOON AT XJ00. I PERFORMED THOROUGH PREFLT PLANNING WHICH INCLUDED WT AND BAL, COMPUTATION OF WIND, GND SPD AND ESTIMATED TIMES ENRTE FOR EACH LEG OF THE FLT. MY PREFLT PLANNING DETERMINED THAT THE FLT FROM ZZZ TO ZZZ1 WOULD TAKE JUST UNDER 2 HRS. I CALCULATED THE RETURN FLT TO TAKE 1 HR 40 MINS. THEREFORE, I CALCULATED THE ENTIRE ROUND TRIP TO TAKE 3 HRS 40 MINS. I GENERALLY PLAN FUEL BURN CONSERVATIVELY IN THE C172, WHICH CARRIES 40 GALLONS OF USABLE FUEL. I PLAN FOR A FUEL BURN OF 9 GPH. THUS, AT A CONSERVATIVE 9 GPH FUEL BURN, I SHOULD HAVE HAD 4 HRS 24 MINS WORTH OF FUEL ON BOARD. THE FLT WAS IN A RENTED C172N WITH 2 21.5 GALLON FUEL TANKS WITH APPROX 40 USABLE GALLONS. PRIOR TO DEP, I PERFORMED A THOROUGH PREFLT INSPECTION OF THE ENTIRE ACFT. DURING THE COURSE OF THE PREFLT, I VISUALLY CHKED BOTH WING TANKS AND FOUND THE R TANK FULL TO THE POINT OF ALMOST SPILLING OUT AND THE L TANK FULL TO THE FUEL TANK COLLAR. THE ACTUAL LEG FROM ZZZ TO ZZZ1 TOOK JUST UNDER 2 HRS, AS PLANNED. FUEL BURN SHOULD HAVE BEEN A TOTAL OF ABOUT 18 GALLONS FOR THE FIRST LEG, WHICH WOULD HAVE LEFT ABOUT 22 GALLONS (2 HRS 24 MINS) OF FUEL REMAINING FOR THE RETURN FLT, WHICH I PLANNED WOULD TAKE ABOUT 1 HR 40 MINS DUE TO THE TAILWIND. I CALCULATED THAT I WOULD HAVE ABOUT 45 MINS OF RESERVE FUEL UPON COMPLETION OF THE TRIP BACK AT ZZZ. THE RETURN FLT BEGAN UNEVENTFULLY, LEVELING OFF AT 3500 FT MSL TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF STRONGER WINDS. APPROX 1 HR 25 MINS INTO THE FLT, 10 MI SW OF THE TOWN OF ZZZ2, THE ENG STOPPED. OUT OF HABIT I PITCHED UP FOR 70 KTS AND BEFORE I WAS ABLE TO TRY AND RESTART THE PLANE, IT STARTED ON ITS OWN. ZZZ2 ARPT WAS LESS THAN 2 MI NE OF TOWN AND WITH THE ENG RUNNING AGAIN I MADE A DETERMINATION TO PUT DOWN THERE TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE ENG FAILURE. LESS THAN 10 SECONDS AFTER ENG QUIT THE FIRST TIME IT STOPPED AGAIN. I PUSHED IN THE MIXTURE AND THE PLANE RESTARTED FOR THE SECOND TIME. THE ENG SEEMED TO START AND STOP AT LEAST 7 TIMES AT WHICH TIME IT WOULD NOT RESTART. WITH LESS THAN 2500 FT AGL, I DETERMINED WE COULD NOT MAKE THE FIELD AND IMMEDIATELY STARTED LOOKING FOR A SUITABLE LNDG SITE. I COULD NOT FIND A LARGE ENOUGH FIELD THAT I FELT COMFORTABLE SETTING THE PLANE DOWN ON, YET A LARGE 4-LANE HWY LAY LESS THAN 2 MI AHEAD. APCHING INTERSTATE HWY XX, MY FIRST THOUGHT WAS TO LAND WITH THE TFC HDG WBOUND BUT I SAW TOO MANY SETS OF PWR LINES. I TURNED R AND WITH A SLIGHT TAILWIND SET UP TO LAND WITH THE TFC HDG EBOUND. I LANDED IN THE FAST LANE OF EBOUND TFC, SETTING DOWN WITH THE STALL HORN BLARING. AT WHAT SEEMED LIKE 25-30 KTS, I MOVED THE PLANE INTO THE GRASS MEDIAN TO AVOID ANY APCHING TFC FROM THE REAR. I CERTAINLY CANNOT EXPLAIN WHY THE ACFT RAN OUT OF FUEL AFTER ONLY FLYING 3.5 HRS, WHEN IT SHOULD HAVE HAD A SOLID HR OF FUEL REMAINING IN THE TANKS. THE ONLY EXPLANATIONS I CAN OFFER ARE THE FOLLOWING: 1) THE ACFT HAD SOME TYPE OF FUEL LEAK, OR 2) THE ACFT WAS BURNING FAR MORE FUEL THAN IS SPECIFIED IN THE ACFT FLT MANUAL/PLT HANDBOOK. IN TERMS OF THINGS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE TO PREVENT THE OCCURRENCE, I COULD HAVE MANUALLY CHKED THE FUEL TANKS WHILE IN ZZZ1 BEFORE MAKING THE RETURN FLT WITH A FUEL INDICATOR TUBE. THIS MAY HAVE INDICATED A POSSIBLE FUEL LEAK OR UNUSUALLY HIGH FUEL BURN ON THAT LEG. I DID NOT DO THIS BECAUSE I VISUALLY VERIFIED THAT WE HAD FULL FUEL TANKS UPON LEAVING ZZZ AND MY PREFLT PLANNING DETERMINED THAT WE SHOULDHAVE HAD ABOUT 45 MINS OF FUEL REMAINING UPON THE COMPLETION OF THE FLT BACK AT ZZZ.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.