37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 533909 |
Time | |
Date | 200112 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : dfw.airport |
State Reference | TX |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 400 agl bound upper : 1000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : dfw.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : dfw.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer pilot : commercial pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 207 flight time total : 19346 flight time type : 3361 |
ASRS Report | 533909 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : airborne critical non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued alert controller : issued new clearance controller : separated traffic none taken : detected after the fact |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 6000 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | FAA Airport ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error Intra Facility Coordination Failure |
Situations | |
ATC Facility | procedure or policy : dfw.tower staffing : dfw.tower |
Narrative:
We took off from dfw on runway 18L (west side of field, with west tower frequency 124.15). Our instructions prior to takeoff were to fly heading 155 degrees after takeoff (a 19 degree left turn from runway heading). Cleared for takeoff. At 400 ft afe, I began a shallow left turn to 155 degrees. Just as I rolled out on 155 degrees, tower controller came on with a sense of urgency directing us to turn right to 190 degrees. We did so and then noted both visually and on TCASII, an MD80 who had taken off from the east side of the field (different tower frequency). It would appear that the 2 tower controllers did not coordinate their actions well as our controller had given us a heading which was going to constantly reduce the lateral separation between us. No TCASII warning of any kind (TA or RA) occurred. In large part, this problem was controller induced. I did have to ask myself if there was anything I could have done to prevent the controller's error from going as far as it did. I believe if I had asked the captain if we were clear left before I started my turn at 400 ft afe, that the captain would have seen the MD80 and questioned the controller before turning. Another lesson learned.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737-300 CREW WAS GIVEN A HEADING AFTER TKOF THAT TURNED THE ACFT INTO A DEPARTING MD80 TAKING OFF ON A PARALLEL RWY AT DFW.
Narrative: WE TOOK OFF FROM DFW ON RWY 18L (W SIDE OF FIELD, WITH W TWR FREQ 124.15). OUR INSTRUCTIONS PRIOR TO TKOF WERE TO FLY HEADING 155 DEGS AFTER TKOF (A 19 DEG L TURN FROM RWY HEADING). CLRED FOR TKOF. AT 400 FT AFE, I BEGAN A SHALLOW L TURN TO 155 DEGS. JUST AS I ROLLED OUT ON 155 DEGS, TWR CTLR CAME ON WITH A SENSE OF URGENCY DIRECTING US TO TURN R TO 190 DEGS. WE DID SO AND THEN NOTED BOTH VISUALLY AND ON TCASII, AN MD80 WHO HAD TAKEN OFF FROM THE E SIDE OF THE FIELD (DIFFERENT TWR FREQ). IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THE 2 TWR CTLRS DID NOT COORDINATE THEIR ACTIONS WELL AS OUR CTLR HAD GIVEN US A HEADING WHICH WAS GOING TO CONSTANTLY REDUCE THE LATERAL SEPARATION BTWN US. NO TCASII WARNING OF ANY KIND (TA OR RA) OCCURRED. IN LARGE PART, THIS PROB WAS CTLR INDUCED. I DID HAVE TO ASK MYSELF IF THERE WAS ANYTHING I COULD HAVE DONE TO PREVENT THE CTLR'S ERROR FROM GOING AS FAR AS IT DID. I BELIEVE IF I HAD ASKED THE CAPT IF WE WERE CLR L BEFORE I STARTED MY TURN AT 400 FT AFE, THAT THE CAPT WOULD HAVE SEEN THE MD80 AND QUESTIONED THE CTLR BEFORE TURNING. ANOTHER LESSON LEARNED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.