37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 547976 |
Time | |
Date | 200205 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : alb.airport |
State Reference | NY |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 12000 msl bound upper : 12500 |
Environment | |
Light | Dawn |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : alb.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Fokker 100 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zbw.artcc |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | King Air C90 E90 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
ASRS Report | 547976 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure non adherence : required legal separation |
Independent Detector | atc equipment other atc equipment : radar aircraft equipment : tcas other flight crewa other flight crewb other other : 3 |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : took evasive action |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 6000 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airspace Structure ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Operational Error |
Narrative:
We were talking to ZBW about 50 mi northwest of albany, level at 12000 ft. On a 330 degree heading, we were cleared to climb from 12000 ft to FL230. Previously, center had given us traffic at 13000 ft at 10-11 O'clock position opposite direction. At 12500 ft we received TCASII traffic alert followed by a descending RA. We responded to the TCASII RA. We saw the king air traffic at the same altitude as us and less than a mi from us. We responded with a descending right turn away from him. The king air responded with a right turn away from us. The king air claims he had us in sight, but made a very late turn to avoid us. This was a completely unnecessary close call. It was XA30 in the morning and there was very little other traffic around. She claimed everything was legal from her end over the radio. We never saw the king air and he should not have been allowed to get that close to us. How do I know he did not lose sight of me with the morning sun in front of him? Either the controller or the king air pilot made this a very close call.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: NMAC BTWN AN F-100 CREW CLBING TO FL230 AND A VFR BE-90 NEAR ALB.
Narrative: WE WERE TALKING TO ZBW ABOUT 50 MI NW OF ALBANY, LEVEL AT 12000 FT. ON A 330 DEG HDG, WE WERE CLRED TO CLB FROM 12000 FT TO FL230. PREVIOUSLY, CTR HAD GIVEN US TFC AT 13000 FT AT 10-11 O'CLOCK POS OPPOSITE DIRECTION. AT 12500 FT WE RECEIVED TCASII TFC ALERT FOLLOWED BY A DSNDING RA. WE RESPONDED TO THE TCASII RA. WE SAW THE KING AIR TFC AT THE SAME ALT AS US AND LESS THAN A MI FROM US. WE RESPONDED WITH A DSNDING R TURN AWAY FROM HIM. THE KING AIR RESPONDED WITH A R TURN AWAY FROM US. THE KING AIR CLAIMS HE HAD US IN SIGHT, BUT MADE A VERY LATE TURN TO AVOID US. THIS WAS A COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY CLOSE CALL. IT WAS XA30 IN THE MORNING AND THERE WAS VERY LITTLE OTHER TFC AROUND. SHE CLAIMED EVERYTHING WAS LEGAL FROM HER END OVER THE RADIO. WE NEVER SAW THE KING AIR AND HE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO GET THAT CLOSE TO US. HOW DO I KNOW HE DID NOT LOSE SIGHT OF ME WITH THE MORNING SUN IN FRONT OF HIM? EITHER THE CTLR OR THE KING AIR PLT MADE THIS A VERY CLOSE CALL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.