37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 556786 |
Time | |
Date | 200208 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sea.airport |
State Reference | WA |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : s46.tracon tower : sea.tower tower : lax.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-400 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : s46.tracon tower : sea.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 240 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 1500 |
ASRS Report | 556786 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance incursion : runway non adherence : company policies non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far other anomaly other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera other controllerb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
We had been cleared for a visual approach to runway 34L at seatac. Approach kept us high (6000 ft, 10 mi out) for traffic that we were to follow. We did not receive or acknowledge a handoff to tower. After an uneventful landing on runway 34L, approach control told us to contact tower. Tower cleared us to cross runway 34R and asked where we had been. Basically, we landed without clearance. I believe that being held up high and close-in kept us busy getting the jet down while looking for traffic. Both of us were shocked when we discovered approach control still in the #1 VHF after landing. Bottom line: even when it's cavu, when you're busy, you can't let your guard down. Simple reminders like turning on the outboard landing lights after receiving landing clearance, are good reminders. Perhaps adding 'landing clearance' as a final item to the landing checklist would help.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: RWY INCURSION WHEN THE FLC OF A B737-400 LWOC, OFF FREQ FROM THE TWR AT SEA, WA.
Narrative: WE HAD BEEN CLRED FOR A VISUAL APCH TO RWY 34L AT SEATAC. APCH KEPT US HIGH (6000 FT, 10 MI OUT) FOR TFC THAT WE WERE TO FOLLOW. WE DID NOT RECEIVE OR ACKNOWLEDGE A HDOF TO TWR. AFTER AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG ON RWY 34L, APCH CTL TOLD US TO CONTACT TWR. TWR CLRED US TO CROSS RWY 34R AND ASKED WHERE WE HAD BEEN. BASICALLY, WE LANDED WITHOUT CLRNC. I BELIEVE THAT BEING HELD UP HIGH AND CLOSE-IN KEPT US BUSY GETTING THE JET DOWN WHILE LOOKING FOR TFC. BOTH OF US WERE SHOCKED WHEN WE DISCOVERED APCH CTL STILL IN THE #1 VHF AFTER LNDG. BOTTOM LINE: EVEN WHEN IT'S CAVU, WHEN YOU'RE BUSY, YOU CAN'T LET YOUR GUARD DOWN. SIMPLE REMINDERS LIKE TURNING ON THE OUTBOARD LNDG LIGHTS AFTER RECEIVING LNDG CLRNC, ARE GOOD REMINDERS. PERHAPS ADDING 'LNDG CLRNC' AS A FINAL ITEM TO THE LNDG CHKLIST WOULD HELP.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.