37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 557671 |
Time | |
Date | 200208 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ord.airport |
State Reference | IL |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : holding |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument pilot : multi engine |
ASRS Report | 557671 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : wake turbulence other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airspace Structure ATC Human Performance Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance Weather Airport |
Primary Problem | Ambiguous |
Narrative:
Location: runway 32L intersection hold short, taxi pretkof. Twice in as many weeks, we have experienced a 10 min or longer delay awaiting takeoff due to airport landing/departing confign. The situation at ord seems to happen when landing runway 4 and runway 9 while departing off of runway 32L. In this situation, all aircraft B757 and larger are delayed waiting for a large gap between runway 9L arrs so that our wake does not affect them. This problem appears to have gotten worse this month. When ord is expecting a high amount of arrs, seems like it would make more sense to send B757 and larger aircraft off of runway 32R, runway 4L or runway 9L so that we are not delayed as long waiting for the gap in landing traffic. I'm assuming the gap would not have to be as big if we are lifting off somewhere other than in the arrival's flare zone.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR PLT COMPLAINS THAT B757 AND LARGER AT ORD RECEIVE MORE DELAYS OF 10 MINS OR MORE THAN OTHER FLTS BECAUSE THEY CAUSE WAKE TURB.
Narrative: LOCATION: RWY 32L INTXN HOLD SHORT, TAXI PRETKOF. TWICE IN AS MANY WKS, WE HAVE EXPERIENCED A 10 MIN OR LONGER DELAY AWAITING TKOF DUE TO ARPT LNDG/DEPARTING CONFIGN. THE SIT AT ORD SEEMS TO HAPPEN WHEN LNDG RWY 4 AND RWY 9 WHILE DEPARTING OFF OF RWY 32L. IN THIS SIT, ALL ACFT B757 AND LARGER ARE DELAYED WAITING FOR A LARGE GAP BTWN RWY 9L ARRS SO THAT OUR WAKE DOES NOT AFFECT THEM. THIS PROB APPEARS TO HAVE GOTTEN WORSE THIS MONTH. WHEN ORD IS EXPECTING A HIGH AMOUNT OF ARRS, SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD MAKE MORE SENSE TO SEND B757 AND LARGER ACFT OFF OF RWY 32R, RWY 4L OR RWY 9L SO THAT WE ARE NOT DELAYED AS LONG WAITING FOR THE GAP IN LNDG TFC. I'M ASSUMING THE GAP WOULD NOT HAVE TO BE AS BIG IF WE ARE LIFTING OFF SOMEWHERE OTHER THAN IN THE ARR'S FLARE ZONE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.