37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 561899 |
Time | |
Date | 200209 |
Day | Sun |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sfo.airport |
State Reference | CA |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 1500 agl bound upper : 2500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : o90.tracon tower : sfo.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B757 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : o90.tracon tower : sfo.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Commercial Fixed Wing |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : flight engineer pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 14000 flight time type : 5000 |
ASRS Report | 561899 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : weather non adherence : required legal separation non adherence : clearance |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Weather Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
During approach to sfo, bay approach asked us to maintain visual separation for commuter aircraft landing sfo runway 28L. Approach asked us if we could see the airport or san mateo bridge. We indicated 'bridge in sight.' approach cleared us visual approach runway 28R, maintain visual with aircraft runway 28L, which we acknowledged in sight. Over the san mateo bridge and just outside, it was a localized area of cloud cover. At about 2500 ft, we entered the cloud deck and lost sight of parallel traffic which was approximately 2 mi ahead of us. Being the PF, I stayed well right of the localizer and we maintained separation using TCASII. We were out of visual contact with the other aircraft for maybe 45 seconds or so. However, at the bridge, 1500 ft AGL, we broke out and reacquired the other aircraft. I then intercepted the localizer and made a normal landing. In retrospect, we should have notified ATC immediately of loss of visual contact. However, this was the end of the day and get homeitis was taking over. This schedule started with an all nighter the night before from sfo-ord at XA00 and though there is adequate rest in the schedule, I usually only sleep for 5-6 hours. (I've found most pilots agree this is about all the rest they can get on one of these schedules.) this schedule was preceded by another all nighter which meant I had 2 short sleep cycles in a row. So fatigue was a mitigating factor, as well as the desire to get home to my own bed!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B757 FLC LOST VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE COMMUTER ACFT AHEAD ON PARALLEL RWY VISUAL APCH DUE TO FLYING THROUGH A CLOUD AREA WITHOUT NOTIFYING TWR.
Narrative: DURING APCH TO SFO, BAY APCH ASKED US TO MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION FOR COMMUTER ACFT LNDG SFO RWY 28L. APCH ASKED US IF WE COULD SEE THE ARPT OR SAN MATEO BRIDGE. WE INDICATED 'BRIDGE IN SIGHT.' APCH CLRED US VISUAL APCH RWY 28R, MAINTAIN VISUAL WITH ACFT RWY 28L, WHICH WE ACKNOWLEDGED IN SIGHT. OVER THE SAN MATEO BRIDGE AND JUST OUTSIDE, IT WAS A LOCALIZED AREA OF CLOUD COVER. AT ABOUT 2500 FT, WE ENTERED THE CLOUD DECK AND LOST SIGHT OF PARALLEL TFC WHICH WAS APPROX 2 MI AHEAD OF US. BEING THE PF, I STAYED WELL R OF THE LOC AND WE MAINTAINED SEPARATION USING TCASII. WE WERE OUT OF VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE OTHER ACFT FOR MAYBE 45 SECONDS OR SO. HOWEVER, AT THE BRIDGE, 1500 FT AGL, WE BROKE OUT AND REACQUIRED THE OTHER ACFT. I THEN INTERCEPTED THE LOC AND MADE A NORMAL LNDG. IN RETROSPECT, WE SHOULD HAVE NOTIFIED ATC IMMEDIATELY OF LOSS OF VISUAL CONTACT. HOWEVER, THIS WAS THE END OF THE DAY AND GET HOMEITIS WAS TAKING OVER. THIS SCHEDULE STARTED WITH AN ALL NIGHTER THE NIGHT BEFORE FROM SFO-ORD AT XA00 AND THOUGH THERE IS ADEQUATE REST IN THE SCHEDULE, I USUALLY ONLY SLEEP FOR 5-6 HRS. (I'VE FOUND MOST PLTS AGREE THIS IS ABOUT ALL THE REST THEY CAN GET ON ONE OF THESE SCHEDULES.) THIS SCHEDULE WAS PRECEDED BY ANOTHER ALL NIGHTER WHICH MEANT I HAD 2 SHORT SLEEP CYCLES IN A ROW. SO FATIGUE WAS A MITIGATING FACTOR, AS WELL AS THE DESIRE TO GET HOME TO MY OWN BED!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.