Narrative:

B767-300 flight crew advised oil quantity and oil pressure were decreasing. Flight was approximately abeam gso. Captain was advised by maintenance coordinator to not shut engine down unless low pressure light illuminated -- consistent with company procedures. Flight coordinated with ATC to return to atl. After initial call advising of oil pressure and quantity going down, I checked conditions, NOTAMS, etc, at airports between aircraft's position and atl, in the event engine shutdown became necessary. 20 mins later, captain called to advise that left engine oil pressure low light had illuminated, and he was going to shut the left engine, resulting in an emergency situation, and the captain stating he was proceeding to atl, exercising his emergency authority/authorized. I did not think it prudent at that point to be offering other options for landing locations, as the crew was busy flying an aircraft with 1 engine out, and I did not want to question the captain's authority/authorized or knowledge of the far's by reciting the requirement to land at the nearest suitable airport. I continued to monitor the flight's progress back to atl, as well as conditions at several other airports in the event that it was necessary to find an alternate for atl.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: DISPATCHER QUESTIONS THE DECISION OF THE PIC OF A TURN BACK DURING A NIGHT OP RETURN LAND TO ATL OF A B767-300 AFTER AN INFLT ENG SHUTDOWN NEAR GSO, NC.

Narrative: B767-300 FLT CREW ADVISED OIL QUANTITY AND OIL PRESSURE WERE DECREASING. FLT WAS APPROX ABEAM GSO. CAPT WAS ADVISED BY MAINT COORDINATOR TO NOT SHUT ENG DOWN UNLESS LOW PRESSURE LIGHT ILLUMINATED -- CONSISTENT WITH COMPANY PROCS. FLT COORDINATED WITH ATC TO RETURN TO ATL. AFTER INITIAL CALL ADVISING OF OIL PRESSURE AND QUANTITY GOING DOWN, I CHKED CONDITIONS, NOTAMS, ETC, AT ARPTS BTWN ACFT'S POS AND ATL, IN THE EVENT ENG SHUTDOWN BECAME NECESSARY. 20 MINS LATER, CAPT CALLED TO ADVISE THAT L ENG OIL PRESSURE LOW LIGHT HAD ILLUMINATED, AND HE WAS GOING TO SHUT THE L ENG, RESULTING IN AN EMER SIT, AND THE CAPT STATING HE WAS PROCEEDING TO ATL, EXERCISING HIS EMER AUTH. I DID NOT THINK IT PRUDENT AT THAT POINT TO BE OFFERING OTHER OPTIONS FOR LNDG LOCATIONS, AS THE CREW WAS BUSY FLYING AN ACFT WITH 1 ENG OUT, AND I DID NOT WANT TO QUESTION THE CAPT'S AUTH OR KNOWLEDGE OF THE FAR'S BY RECITING THE REQUIREMENT TO LAND AT THE NEAREST SUITABLE ARPT. I CONTINUED TO MONITOR THE FLT'S PROGRESS BACK TO ATL, AS WELL AS CONDITIONS AT SEVERAL OTHER ARPTS IN THE EVENT THAT IT WAS NECESSARY TO FIND AN ALTERNATE FOR ATL.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.