Narrative:

Descent below stepdown altitude on intermediate approach segment. With the haze and dusk, we thought we had the pier and runway in sight to runway 31 and were transitioning to visual. We saw 2 very bright lights (white) that looked like VASI/PAPI, to the left of runway. When we started descent, neither light was changing to show a correction to or on glide path. We decided that the DME and these lights were not correct given our altitude and distance to runway. We stopped descent, continued on localizer. Just as we started to climb back up the rear pier, runway, and VASI came into sight. We descended a couple of hundred ft before recognized our mistake. Shortly after we recognized the situation, the controller gave a couple of altitude alerts and altimeter settings. Had the visibility been better or worse or the shadows been different, this wouldn't have occurred. Better visibility and we would have known that wasn't the runway. Decreased visibility and we wouldn't have seen what we thought was the runway 4 stayed strictly on instrument approach.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: DSCNT BELOW VISUAL GS IN LOW VISIBILITY CONDITIONS INITIATED BY THE FLT CREW OF A DC9 ON THE LDA APCH RWY 22 FOR A CIRCLE TO RWY 31 AT LGA, NY.

Narrative: DSCNT BELOW STEPDOWN ALT ON INTERMEDIATE APCH SEGMENT. WITH THE HAZE AND DUSK, WE THOUGHT WE HAD THE PIER AND RWY IN SIGHT TO RWY 31 AND WERE TRANSITIONING TO VISUAL. WE SAW 2 VERY BRIGHT LIGHTS (WHITE) THAT LOOKED LIKE VASI/PAPI, TO THE L OF RWY. WHEN WE STARTED DSCNT, NEITHER LIGHT WAS CHANGING TO SHOW A CORRECTION TO OR ON GLIDE PATH. WE DECIDED THAT THE DME AND THESE LIGHTS WERE NOT CORRECT GIVEN OUR ALT AND DISTANCE TO RWY. WE STOPPED DSCNT, CONTINUED ON LOC. JUST AS WE STARTED TO CLB BACK UP THE REAR PIER, RWY, AND VASI CAME INTO SIGHT. WE DSNDED A COUPLE OF HUNDRED FT BEFORE RECOGNIZED OUR MISTAKE. SHORTLY AFTER WE RECOGNIZED THE SIT, THE CTLR GAVE A COUPLE OF ALT ALERTS AND ALTIMETER SETTINGS. HAD THE VISIBILITY BEEN BETTER OR WORSE OR THE SHADOWS BEEN DIFFERENT, THIS WOULDN'T HAVE OCCURRED. BETTER VISIBILITY AND WE WOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT WASN'T THE RWY. DECREASED VISIBILITY AND WE WOULDN'T HAVE SEEN WHAT WE THOUGHT WAS THE RWY 4 STAYED STRICTLY ON INST APCH.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.