37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 599629 |
Time | |
Date | 200311 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : pqf.ndb |
State Reference | TX |
Altitude | agl single value : 600 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Weather Elements | other |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern |
Flight Plan | None |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Bonanza 33 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 17 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : cfi pilot : commercial |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 524 flight time type : 30 |
ASRS Report | 599629 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 200 vertical : 0 |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airport Flight Crew Human Performance Environmental Factor |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
While practicing touch and goes at hqz with a student, we had a 'close call with another aircraft. The #2 aircraft was practicing the ILS runway 17 into hqz, VFR conditions, and I did not hear any radio calls from him. When my student turned a 2.8 (by GPS) mi final, with 2 aircraft ahead of us, the aircraft on the ILS reported a '3 mi final on the ILS inbound for landing.' I saw the aircraft just off our right, converging from above us. I made an immediate left turn and requested that the other aircraft make an evasive maneuver to the right. He did so, completed a 360 degrees and returned for landing. I never heard him report his tail number again. This could have been avoided if the aircraft on the instrument approach had made more radio position reports and made an effort to fit into the pattern, which was already congested. All the other aircraft in the pattern were making appropriate radio calls and being 'safe.'
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: WHILE SHOOTING TOUCH AND GOES, FLT INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT IN SMA ON LONG BASE TURN TO FINAL EXPERIENCE NMAC WITH BE33 SHOOTING PRACTICE ILS TO RWY 17 AT HQZ.
Narrative: WHILE PRACTICING TOUCH AND GOES AT HQZ WITH A STUDENT, WE HAD A 'CLOSE CALL WITH ANOTHER ACFT. THE #2 ACFT WAS PRACTICING THE ILS RWY 17 INTO HQZ, VFR CONDITIONS, AND I DID NOT HEAR ANY RADIO CALLS FROM HIM. WHEN MY STUDENT TURNED A 2.8 (BY GPS) MI FINAL, WITH 2 ACFT AHEAD OF US, THE ACFT ON THE ILS RPTED A '3 MI FINAL ON THE ILS INBOUND FOR LNDG.' I SAW THE ACFT JUST OFF OUR R, CONVERGING FROM ABOVE US. I MADE AN IMMEDIATE L TURN AND REQUESTED THAT THE OTHER ACFT MAKE AN EVASIVE MANEUVER TO THE R. HE DID SO, COMPLETED A 360 DEGS AND RETURNED FOR LNDG. I NEVER HEARD HIM RPT HIS TAIL NUMBER AGAIN. THIS COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED IF THE ACFT ON THE INST APCH HAD MADE MORE RADIO POS RPTS AND MADE AN EFFORT TO FIT INTO THE PATTERN, WHICH WAS ALREADY CONGESTED. ALL THE OTHER ACFT IN THE PATTERN WERE MAKING APPROPRIATE RADIO CALLS AND BEING 'SAFE.'
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.