37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 603785 |
Time | |
Date | 200312 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : sav.airport |
State Reference | GA |
Altitude | msl single value : 6000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Mixed |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : sav.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-800 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 36 other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : traffic pattern arrival : on vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 120 flight time total : 5000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 603785 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
On descent into sav, approach controller advised us we had missed a turn issued by the previous controller to a 180 degrees (which would have given us a downwind to ILS runway 36). We complied with the heading instruction at that time and the rest of the approach and landing was uneventful. Neither the first officer or myself could ever remember the heading being issued. We presumed it was issued during earlier part of the descent. We were very busy because airport WX dropped from 1200 ft overcast/8 mi to 800 ft overcast/2 1/2 mi in a 27 min flight. This prompted a change in approach and runway -- a runway that was shorter, ungrooved and wet. We were very busy rebriefing the approach and discussing the proper flaps, autobrakes, etc. We can only surmise the heading was part of an intermediate descent clearance given during our revised approach brief. We found it odd that the issuing controller did not 'correct' us a few moment after giving us the heading. Instead we get a frequency change to a new controller who then waited a few moments before advising us we had not turned as instructed to do earlier.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: B737 CREW LNDG SAV IS INFORMED OF A MISSED HEADING ASSIGNMENT BY ATC.
Narrative: ON DSCNT INTO SAV, APCH CTLR ADVISED US WE HAD MISSED A TURN ISSUED BY THE PREVIOUS CTLR TO A 180 DEGS (WHICH WOULD HAVE GIVEN US A DOWNWIND TO ILS RWY 36). WE COMPLIED WITH THE HDG INSTRUCTION AT THAT TIME AND THE REST OF THE APCH AND LNDG WAS UNEVENTFUL. NEITHER THE FO OR MYSELF COULD EVER REMEMBER THE HDG BEING ISSUED. WE PRESUMED IT WAS ISSUED DURING EARLIER PART OF THE DSCNT. WE WERE VERY BUSY BECAUSE ARPT WX DROPPED FROM 1200 FT OVCST/8 MI TO 800 FT OVCST/2 1/2 MI IN A 27 MIN FLT. THIS PROMPTED A CHANGE IN APCH AND RWY -- A RWY THAT WAS SHORTER, UNGROOVED AND WET. WE WERE VERY BUSY REBRIEFING THE APCH AND DISCUSSING THE PROPER FLAPS, AUTOBRAKES, ETC. WE CAN ONLY SURMISE THE HDG WAS PART OF AN INTERMEDIATE DSCNT CLRNC GIVEN DURING OUR REVISED APCH BRIEF. WE FOUND IT ODD THAT THE ISSUING CTLR DID NOT 'CORRECT' US A FEW MOMENT AFTER GIVING US THE HDG. INSTEAD WE GET A FREQ CHANGE TO A NEW CTLR WHO THEN WAITED A FEW MOMENTS BEFORE ADVISING US WE HAD NOT TURNED AS INSTRUCTED TO DO EARLIER.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.