37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 609373 |
Time | |
Date | 200402 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : sts.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Citation III, VI, VII |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 40 flight time total : 4200 flight time type : 450 |
ASRS Report | 609373 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper documentation maintenance problem : improper maintenance non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : repair performance deficiency : scheduled maintenance performance deficiency : inspection performance deficiency : logbook entry |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft FAA Maintenance Human Performance Chart Or Publication |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
I performed a normal pre flight inspection and found nothing amiss. The next day I was assigned a new sic and he showed me where his crew grounded an identical plane earlier in the week. A cabin overhead panel overlapped the emergency window exit by approximately 1/4 inch. Had it become necessary to use the emergency exit, it is possible that the overhead panel may have impinged on its operation. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the reporter stated that after being shown the overhead panel overlap interference with the emergency exit and the difficulty removing the exit, all of the fleet was inspected. The reporter said of the airplanes in the fleet, another two were found with the exits blocked. The reporter stated that during routine maintenance, the technician must have encountered some difficulty removing the exit and should have taken corrective action.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CESSNA 650 CAPT RPTS DISCOVERING THE EMER EXITS OF TWO AIRPLANES BLOCKED AND UNUSABLE BY OVERHEAD PANEL OVERLAP.
Narrative: I PERFORMED A NORMAL PRE FLT INSPECTION AND FOUND NOTHING AMISS. THE NEXT DAY I WAS ASSIGNED A NEW SIC AND HE SHOWED ME WHERE HIS CREW GNDED AN IDENTICAL PLANE EARLIER IN THE WEEK. A CABIN OVERHEAD PANEL OVERLAPPED THE EMER WINDOW EXIT BY APPROX 1/4 INCH. HAD IT BECOME NECESSARY TO USE THE EMER EXIT, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE OVERHEAD PANEL MAY HAVE IMPINGED ON ITS OPERATION. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE RPTR STATED THAT AFTER BEING SHOWN THE OVERHEAD PANEL OVERLAP INTERFERENCE WITH THE EMER EXIT AND THE DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE EXIT, ALL OF THE FLEET WAS INSPECTED. THE RPTR SAID OF THE AIRPLANES IN THE FLEET, ANOTHER TWO WERE FOUND WITH THE EXITS BLOCKED. THE RPTR STATED THAT DURING ROUTINE MAINT, THE TECHNICIAN MUST HAVE ENCOUNTERED SOME DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE EXIT AND SHOULD HAVE TAKEN CORRECTIVE ACTION.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.