37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 628567 |
Time | |
Date | 200408 |
Day | Tue |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : phl.airport |
State Reference | PA |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : gmu.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : takeoff roll ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
ASRS Report | 628567 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper documentation maintenance problem : non compliance with mel non adherence : company policies non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : dc bus off light other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | other other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Aircraft Chart Or Publication Company |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
The dc bus off light remained on after engines were started. The dc bus off checklist was accomplished. The dc loads and voltages were normal. The dc bus sensing circuit breaker was checked/reset and the light remained illuminated. If this occurs the checklist states 'disregard since the bus is pwred as indicated by dc loads and bus voltages.' I did just that. The loads and voltages were monitored on the leg to dfw and the trip was uneventful. Maintenance met the aircraft and looked at the book. Nothing was said to me, but the maintenance man told the outbound captain he thought the aircraft should have gone back to the gate at phl for repairs since the item was not crew placardable. Unfortunately, when the checklist said, 'disregard,' I did not check the MEL. I just assumed that the aircraft was okay to fly especially since it did not have an 'if in-flight or if on the ground,' section like the battery charger light checklist. If maintenance is correct, the dc bus off checklist should be changed to reflect that information. The word 'disregard' also needs to be changed or removed.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MD80 CREW TOOK OFF WITH THE DC BUS OFF LIGHT ILLUMINATED. THE CREW DID NOT MAKE A MAINT LOG DISCREPANCY OR CHK THE MEL.
Narrative: THE DC BUS OFF LIGHT REMAINED ON AFTER ENGS WERE STARTED. THE DC BUS OFF CHKLIST WAS ACCOMPLISHED. THE DC LOADS AND VOLTAGES WERE NORMAL. THE DC BUS SENSING CIRCUIT BREAKER WAS CHKED/RESET AND THE LIGHT REMAINED ILLUMINATED. IF THIS OCCURS THE CHKLIST STATES 'DISREGARD SINCE THE BUS IS PWRED AS INDICATED BY DC LOADS AND BUS VOLTAGES.' I DID JUST THAT. THE LOADS AND VOLTAGES WERE MONITORED ON THE LEG TO DFW AND THE TRIP WAS UNEVENTFUL. MAINT MET THE ACFT AND LOOKED AT THE BOOK. NOTHING WAS SAID TO ME, BUT THE MAINT MAN TOLD THE OUTBOUND CAPT HE THOUGHT THE ACFT SHOULD HAVE GONE BACK TO THE GATE AT PHL FOR REPAIRS SINCE THE ITEM WAS NOT CREW PLACARDABLE. UNFORTUNATELY, WHEN THE CHKLIST SAID, 'DISREGARD,' I DID NOT CHK THE MEL. I JUST ASSUMED THAT THE ACFT WAS OKAY TO FLY ESPECIALLY SINCE IT DID NOT HAVE AN 'IF INFLT OR IF ON THE GND,' SECTION LIKE THE BATTERY CHARGER LIGHT CHKLIST. IF MAINT IS CORRECT, THE DC BUS OFF CHKLIST SHOULD BE CHANGED TO REFLECT THAT INFO. THE WORD 'DISREGARD' ALSO NEEDS TO BE CHANGED OR REMOVED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.