37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 629808 |
Time | |
Date | 200409 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : clt.airport |
State Reference | NC |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | IMC |
Weather Elements | Fog |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : clt.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet CL65, Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | ils localizer & glide slope : 36r |
Flight Phase | descent : approach landing : roll |
Route In Use | approach : instrument precision |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 175 flight time total : 6000 flight time type : 540 |
ASRS Report | 629808 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : landing without clearance non adherence : far non adherence : company policies |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
Day 4 of a 5 day trip, early morning arrival in charlotte. Approach to minimums on runway 36R. Handed off to tower on 5 mi final. Tower responded to our call with 'slow to approach speed.' we replied and complied although we were pretty much on speed at that time. We (crew) had a brief comment about spacing on the aircraft in front of us which looked reasonable at 3+ mi. We descended into fog at 350 ft AGL and soon after picked up the approach lights. The landing was normal and the runway was clear. No comments were made about landing clearance and, in fact, we might have had one, but I don't remember receiving one and my nose landing light was still off. (I usually turn it on as my indication of a landing clearance.)
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CARJ FLT CREW LANDS AT CLT AND THEN REALIZES THAT THEY MAY HAVE LANDED WITHOUT A CLRNC.
Narrative: DAY 4 OF A 5 DAY TRIP, EARLY MORNING ARR IN CHARLOTTE. APCH TO MINIMUMS ON RWY 36R. HANDED OFF TO TWR ON 5 MI FINAL. TWR RESPONDED TO OUR CALL WITH 'SLOW TO APCH SPD.' WE REPLIED AND COMPLIED ALTHOUGH WE WERE PRETTY MUCH ON SPD AT THAT TIME. WE (CREW) HAD A BRIEF COMMENT ABOUT SPACING ON THE ACFT IN FRONT OF US WHICH LOOKED REASONABLE AT 3+ MI. WE DSNDED INTO FOG AT 350 FT AGL AND SOON AFTER PICKED UP THE APCH LIGHTS. THE LNDG WAS NORMAL AND THE RWY WAS CLR. NO COMMENTS WERE MADE ABOUT LNDG CLRNC AND, IN FACT, WE MIGHT HAVE HAD ONE, BUT I DON'T REMEMBER RECEIVING ONE AND MY NOSE LNDG LIGHT WAS STILL OFF. (I USUALLY TURN IT ON AS MY INDICATION OF A LNDG CLRNC.)
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.