Narrative:

While conducting an ILS approach to runway 6R lax, our aircraft was level at 2000 ft, heading 090 degrees to intercept final course, cleared approach with approximately 10 mi final, scattered to broken cloud layer at 1300 ft and runway not in sight. We lost our flight director inputs (cause unknown) with heading selected and VOR/localizer armed. While the first officer attempted to correct the problem we received a TCAS TA. Both pilots heads up looking for traffic which appeared from below cloud deck at approximately the 1-2 O'clock position. Tower then issued TA concurrently with TCAS RA alert. Tower then advised traffic had us in sight and would maintain visual separation. We complied with RA alert. Due to conflicting flight director and VOR/localizer information, while complying with RA alert, aircraft was never established on a stable approach, therefore, I elected to go around. It is important to note with utmost concern that we were never advised of traffic departing in the opposite direction at the field. It is my opinion, with the existing WX conditions, this procedure should not be used. It is an accident waiting to happen.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737 LNDG LAX DURING OPPOSITE DIRECTION OPS EXPERIENCED TCAS RA AND EXECUTES GAR.

Narrative: WHILE CONDUCTING AN ILS APCH TO RWY 6R LAX, OUR ACFT WAS LEVEL AT 2000 FT, HDG 090 DEGS TO INTERCEPT FINAL COURSE, CLRED APCH WITH APPROX 10 MI FINAL, SCATTERED TO BROKEN CLOUD LAYER AT 1300 FT AND RWY NOT IN SIGHT. WE LOST OUR FLT DIRECTOR INPUTS (CAUSE UNKNOWN) WITH HDG SELECTED AND VOR/LOC ARMED. WHILE THE FO ATTEMPTED TO CORRECT THE PROB WE RECEIVED A TCAS TA. BOTH PLTS HEADS UP LOOKING FOR TFC WHICH APPEARED FROM BELOW CLOUD DECK AT APPROX THE 1-2 O'CLOCK POS. TWR THEN ISSUED TA CONCURRENTLY WITH TCAS RA ALERT. TWR THEN ADVISED TFC HAD US IN SIGHT AND WOULD MAINTAIN VISUAL SEPARATION. WE COMPLIED WITH RA ALERT. DUE TO CONFLICTING FLT DIRECTOR AND VOR/LOC INFO, WHILE COMPLYING WITH RA ALERT, ACFT WAS NEVER ESTABLISHED ON A STABLE APCH, THEREFORE, I ELECTED TO GO AROUND. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE WITH UTMOST CONCERN THAT WE WERE NEVER ADVISED OF TFC DEPARTING IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION AT THE FIELD. IT IS MY OPINION, WITH THE EXISTING WX CONDITIONS, THIS PROC SHOULD NOT BE USED. IT IS AN ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.