Narrative:

Upon review of the logbook both the captain and myself noted that our APU had been both found to be inoperative and deferred by maintenance in stl. This, to me, seemed to indicate that the aircraft had started its day at the hangar and had flown only this one leg into dfw. There had been several discrepancies written as corrected in stl before the one pertaining to the APU, and so to my eye everything appeared to be in order. I immediately set about my normal preflight duties without giving the matter any more thought. Boarding, engine start, and taxi were all on time and normal. It then dawned on me that there was no placard pertaining to the need for a xtie relay check to be performed prior to first flight of the day. With other normal checklist and taxi duties taking the majority of my time and attention, we arrived at the end of runway 35L at dfw and were #1 for takeoff by the time I had had enough time to process and what I perceived to be strictly placard-related problem to the captain. I also pulled up the MEL and hurriedly scanned the APU deferral verbiage, but was unable to find anything relating to the need for a xtie relay check placard. En route to rsw, I began to dig deeper into the MEL, discovering that the verbiage related to deferral of the APU as a whole unit also stipulated that the APU generator be deferred as prescribed. This section refers to the need for a xtie relay check and placard installation. The captain and I together came to the conclusion that the aircraft had flown from stl to dfw without a logbook entry being made for that flight and that maintenance personnel in stl had not installed a required placard for said deferral. In range of rsw, we advised station maintenance of the problem. To my knowledge, the return flight to dfw left on time in a fully legal airplane, with the possible exception of the missing logbook entry for the flight from stl to dfw.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: FLT CREW OF MD80 DISCOVER THAT DEFERRAL OF THEIR INOP APU WAS NOT PROPERLY DOCUMENTED BY MAINT.

Narrative: UPON REVIEW OF THE LOGBOOK BOTH THE CAPT AND MYSELF NOTED THAT OUR APU HAD BEEN BOTH FOUND TO BE INOP AND DEFERRED BY MAINT IN STL. THIS, TO ME, SEEMED TO INDICATE THAT THE ACFT HAD STARTED ITS DAY AT THE HANGAR AND HAD FLOWN ONLY THIS ONE LEG INTO DFW. THERE HAD BEEN SEVERAL DISCREPANCIES WRITTEN AS CORRECTED IN STL BEFORE THE ONE PERTAINING TO THE APU, AND SO TO MY EYE EVERYTHING APPEARED TO BE IN ORDER. I IMMEDIATELY SET ABOUT MY NORMAL PREFLT DUTIES WITHOUT GIVING THE MATTER ANY MORE THOUGHT. BOARDING, ENG START, AND TAXI WERE ALL ON TIME AND NORMAL. IT THEN DAWNED ON ME THAT THERE WAS NO PLACARD PERTAINING TO THE NEED FOR A XTIE RELAY CHK TO BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FIRST FLT OF THE DAY. WITH OTHER NORMAL CHKLIST AND TAXI DUTIES TAKING THE MAJORITY OF MY TIME AND ATTN, WE ARRIVED AT THE END OF RWY 35L AT DFW AND WERE #1 FOR TKOF BY THE TIME I HAD HAD ENOUGH TIME TO PROCESS AND WHAT I PERCEIVED TO BE STRICTLY PLACARD-RELATED PROB TO THE CAPT. I ALSO PULLED UP THE MEL AND HURRIEDLY SCANNED THE APU DEFERRAL VERBIAGE, BUT WAS UNABLE TO FIND ANYTHING RELATING TO THE NEED FOR A XTIE RELAY CHK PLACARD. ENRTE TO RSW, I BEGAN TO DIG DEEPER INTO THE MEL, DISCOVERING THAT THE VERBIAGE RELATED TO DEFERRAL OF THE APU AS A WHOLE UNIT ALSO STIPULATED THAT THE APU GENERATOR BE DEFERRED AS PRESCRIBED. THIS SECTION REFERS TO THE NEED FOR A XTIE RELAY CHK AND PLACARD INSTALLATION. THE CAPT AND I TOGETHER CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE ACFT HAD FLOWN FROM STL TO DFW WITHOUT A LOGBOOK ENTRY BEING MADE FOR THAT FLT AND THAT MAINT PERSONNEL IN STL HAD NOT INSTALLED A REQUIRED PLACARD FOR SAID DEFERRAL. IN RANGE OF RSW, WE ADVISED STATION MAINT OF THE PROB. TO MY KNOWLEDGE, THE RETURN FLT TO DFW LEFT ON TIME IN A FULLY LEGAL AIRPLANE, WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF THE MISSING LOGBOOK ENTRY FOR THE FLT FROM STL TO DFW.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.