37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 641315 |
Time | |
Date | 200412 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : tpa.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | msl single value : 18000 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zjx.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 135 flight time total : 13000 flight time type : 4400 |
ASRS Report | 641315 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : unable |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
During descent into tpa, there was a sudden rattling sound on the captain's sliding window. We thought we hit something and reported what looked like a string flapping around on the window. After landing at tpa, I called maintenance and reported that it turned out to be sealant from the captain's windshield that was flapping around. The sealant appeared to be uncured. Maintenance could not find any record of windshield work having been done on that airplane. The sealant sure looked like fresh stuff. My big concern is that if work is being done, I should be able to find out about it. I don't like being kept in the dark about the maintenance history of my machine. Had I been able to determine that window work had been done it would have made my decision process a lot more sound. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: the captain stated that maintenance was unable to provide information beyond what was in the logbook. The crew did not receive any further follow up. This crew member's best guess from just looking at the seal is that it was new and had not been allowed to cure sufficiently. This flight was the aircraft's final of the day so that maintenance was able to work on it overnight.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN A320 CREW EXPERIENCED A LOOSE CAPT'S SLIDING WINDOW SEAL IMPACTING ON THE ACFT'S FRAME.
Narrative: DURING DSCNT INTO TPA, THERE WAS A SUDDEN RATTLING SOUND ON THE CAPT'S SLIDING WINDOW. WE THOUGHT WE HIT SOMETHING AND RPTED WHAT LOOKED LIKE A STRING FLAPPING AROUND ON THE WINDOW. AFTER LNDG AT TPA, I CALLED MAINT AND RPTED THAT IT TURNED OUT TO BE SEALANT FROM THE CAPT'S WINDSHIELD THAT WAS FLAPPING AROUND. THE SEALANT APPEARED TO BE UNCURED. MAINT COULD NOT FIND ANY RECORD OF WINDSHIELD WORK HAVING BEEN DONE ON THAT AIRPLANE. THE SEALANT SURE LOOKED LIKE FRESH STUFF. MY BIG CONCERN IS THAT IF WORK IS BEING DONE, I SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIND OUT ABOUT IT. I DON'T LIKE BEING KEPT IN THE DARK ABOUT THE MAINT HISTORY OF MY MACHINE. HAD I BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT WINDOW WORK HAD BEEN DONE IT WOULD HAVE MADE MY DECISION PROCESS A LOT MORE SOUND. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: THE CAPT STATED THAT MAINT WAS UNABLE TO PROVIDE INFO BEYOND WHAT WAS IN THE LOGBOOK. THE CREW DID NOT RECEIVE ANY FURTHER FOLLOW UP. THIS CREW MEMBER'S BEST GUESS FROM JUST LOOKING AT THE SEAL IS THAT IT WAS NEW AND HAD NOT BEEN ALLOWED TO CURE SUFFICIENTLY. THIS FLT WAS THE ACFT'S FINAL OF THE DAY SO THAT MAINT WAS ABLE TO WORK ON IT OVERNIGHT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.