37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 645577 |
Time | |
Date | 200501 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | DC-9 50 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Qualification | technician : powerplant technician : airframe technician : fcc |
Experience | maintenance avionics : 20 maintenance technician : 29 |
ASRS Report | 645577 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : non compliance with mel non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other other : 4 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : manuals performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : inspection |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Company Chart Or Publication Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Situations | |
Publication | Minimum Equip List |
Narrative:
I am an a&P mechanic working for air carrier X in ZZZ. I perform on-call radio dispatched maintenance on aircraft on the day shift. I was called by my lead technician to go to aircraft X; talk to the pilot about an APU on MEL deferral. The pilot reported to maintenance that the APU was operational and he wanted it removed from MEL. Upon arriving at aircraft X; I found the APU running. The control circuit breaker collar had been removed; APU started; electrical and pneumatics applied by the pilot. The pilot told me the APU was working normal. I verified the correct operation of the APU. The crew asked if I could clear the APU MEL. I said I would check the logbook and if clean; I would return the APU to service. I verified the original write-up (APU would not start) and deferral. I checked for subsequent re-deferrals. I found none. I cleared the APU for service. On jan/fri/05; my manager received a note from the maintenance manager that stated a ZZZ1 technician on jan/tue/05 had found an air inlet door rod broken; and re-deferred to MEL. When I checked the logbook on jan/wed/05; I did not see this re-deferral. The re-deferred broken rod appears in computer display discrepancy histories. The problem is; the original write-up by the pilot is in the aircraft logbook as well as original deferral; but subsequent re-deferrals often are not in the aircraft logbook. The company uses cards for overnight maintenance. The corrective acton is entered on the card and the maintenance computer; but not necessarily the aircraft logbook. I believe all work should be in aircraft logbook as well as the maintenance computer. The lt and flight line technicians do not have easy access -- sometimes no access to the maintenance computer. They only have access to the hard copy aircraft logbook. With regards to human performance; the pilot should never have activated a de-activated MEL'ed system. As for myself; I should have come to the control center and looked at the maintenance computer for discrepancy history before clearing the APU on MEL.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A DC9-50 APU PREVIOUSLY DEFERRED AS INOP WAS REMOVED FROM THE DEFERRED ITEM LIST USING INCOMPLETE AND INACCURATE DATA.
Narrative: I AM AN A&P MECH WORKING FOR ACR X IN ZZZ. I PERFORM ON-CALL RADIO DISPATCHED MAINT ON ACFT ON THE DAY SHIFT. I WAS CALLED BY MY LEAD TECHNICIAN TO GO TO ACFT X; TALK TO THE PLT ABOUT AN APU ON MEL DEFERRAL. THE PLT RPTED TO MAINT THAT THE APU WAS OPERATIONAL AND HE WANTED IT REMOVED FROM MEL. UPON ARRIVING AT ACFT X; I FOUND THE APU RUNNING. THE CTL CIRCUIT BREAKER COLLAR HAD BEEN REMOVED; APU STARTED; ELECTRICAL AND PNEUMATICS APPLIED BY THE PLT. THE PLT TOLD ME THE APU WAS WORKING NORMAL. I VERIFIED THE CORRECT OP OF THE APU. THE CREW ASKED IF I COULD CLR THE APU MEL. I SAID I WOULD CHK THE LOGBOOK AND IF CLEAN; I WOULD RETURN THE APU TO SVC. I VERIFIED THE ORIGINAL WRITE-UP (APU WOULD NOT START) AND DEFERRAL. I CHKED FOR SUBSEQUENT RE-DEFERRALS. I FOUND NONE. I CLRED THE APU FOR SVC. ON JAN/FRI/05; MY MGR RECEIVED A NOTE FROM THE MAINT MGR THAT STATED A ZZZ1 TECHNICIAN ON JAN/TUE/05 HAD FOUND AN AIR INLET DOOR ROD BROKEN; AND RE-DEFERRED TO MEL. WHEN I CHKED THE LOGBOOK ON JAN/WED/05; I DID NOT SEE THIS RE-DEFERRAL. THE RE-DEFERRED BROKEN ROD APPEARS IN COMPUTER DISPLAY DISCREPANCY HISTORIES. THE PROB IS; THE ORIGINAL WRITE-UP BY THE PLT IS IN THE ACFT LOGBOOK AS WELL AS ORIGINAL DEFERRAL; BUT SUBSEQUENT RE-DEFERRALS OFTEN ARE NOT IN THE ACFT LOGBOOK. THE COMPANY USES CARDS FOR OVERNIGHT MAINT. THE CORRECTIVE ACTON IS ENTERED ON THE CARD AND THE MAINT COMPUTER; BUT NOT NECESSARILY THE ACFT LOGBOOK. I BELIEVE ALL WORK SHOULD BE IN ACFT LOGBOOK AS WELL AS THE MAINT COMPUTER. THE LT AND FLT LINE TECHNICIANS DO NOT HAVE EASY ACCESS -- SOMETIMES NO ACCESS TO THE MAINT COMPUTER. THEY ONLY HAVE ACCESS TO THE HARD COPY ACFT LOGBOOK. WITH REGARDS TO HUMAN PERFORMANCE; THE PLT SHOULD NEVER HAVE ACTIVATED A DE-ACTIVATED MEL'ED SYS. AS FOR MYSELF; I SHOULD HAVE COME TO THE CTL CTR AND LOOKED AT THE MAINT COMPUTER FOR DISCREPANCY HISTORY BEFORE CLRING THE APU ON MEL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.