37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 652165 |
Time | |
Date | 200503 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 10 agl bound upper : 20 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : zzz.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Small Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 135 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 40 flight time total : 6600 flight time type : 3450 |
ASRS Report | 652165 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter : vfr in imc |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : returned to original clearance |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | ATC Human Performance |
Primary Problem | ATC Human Performance |
Narrative:
On an air ambulance flight to ZZZ; while in contact with center; I attempted to listen to ZZZ ATIS. No conditions were being transmitted. Upon handoff from center to approach; I was asked if I had the ATIS. I responded 'negative ATIS.' the controller responded that ZZZ was reporting 1/4 mi in fog. I was 35-40 mi from ZZZ at the time and had ZZZ VASI to runway X in sight; and could see no fog. I called company medical dispatch (located at ZZZ) on #2 communication; asked them to 'look out the window' to see if there was fog. They reported 'a little fog; but visibility ok.' I then called ZZZ tower and asked what they were seeing. The controller said that FSS was calling it 1/4 mi; but he said he could see runway and taxiway lights; lights downtown; etc. I then asked approach to route me over ZZZ so I could look for myself; which they did. I reported that I could see no fog anywhere in the area. Approach said they could not descend me below 2500 ft on an IFR flight plan and asked if I wanted to cancel IFR. I stated that I wasn't observing any fog and was in VFR conditions. I said yes. Approach handed me off to ZZZ tower; and after checking on; the controller again said FSS was reporting 1/4 mi. I told him I was seeing absolutely no fog anywhere and would continue for the runway. It was a completely normal approach to landing. Although I did encounter some light fog in the flare; I never lost sight of the runway edge lights or REIL's at any time. After shutting down and unloading the patient into the ground ambulance; I asked the medical team to look at the conditions on the field. They stated they could clearly see runway and taxiway lights; lights from the FBO on the other side of the field; lights on ZZZ tower and street lights on streets adjacent to the field. In retrospect; even though I could clearly see all relevant runway lights; with FSS reporting 1/4 mi; I should have diverted. I was feeling some pressure to complete the transport as planned since the patient was on a ventilator. By diverting and waiting for the ground ambulance; the ventilator would have to run on battery power for 15-20 mins. I felt the extra time could jeopardize patient safety. At no time did I feel I jeopardized patient or crew safety by landing at ZZZ.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN AIR AMBULANCE PLT COMPLETED A VFR APCH TO A RPTED ONE QUARTER MI VISIBILITY. RPTR CLAIMS THAT ACTUAL VISIBILITY WAS GREATER THAN 3 MI.
Narrative: ON AN AIR AMBULANCE FLT TO ZZZ; WHILE IN CONTACT WITH CTR; I ATTEMPTED TO LISTEN TO ZZZ ATIS. NO CONDITIONS WERE BEING XMITTED. UPON HDOF FROM CTR TO APCH; I WAS ASKED IF I HAD THE ATIS. I RESPONDED 'NEGATIVE ATIS.' THE CTLR RESPONDED THAT ZZZ WAS RPTING 1/4 MI IN FOG. I WAS 35-40 MI FROM ZZZ AT THE TIME AND HAD ZZZ VASI TO RWY X IN SIGHT; AND COULD SEE NO FOG. I CALLED COMPANY MEDICAL DISPATCH (LOCATED AT ZZZ) ON #2 COM; ASKED THEM TO 'LOOK OUT THE WINDOW' TO SEE IF THERE WAS FOG. THEY RPTED 'A LITTLE FOG; BUT VISIBILITY OK.' I THEN CALLED ZZZ TWR AND ASKED WHAT THEY WERE SEEING. THE CTLR SAID THAT FSS WAS CALLING IT 1/4 MI; BUT HE SAID HE COULD SEE RWY AND TXWY LIGHTS; LIGHTS DOWNTOWN; ETC. I THEN ASKED APCH TO RTE ME OVER ZZZ SO I COULD LOOK FOR MYSELF; WHICH THEY DID. I RPTED THAT I COULD SEE NO FOG ANYWHERE IN THE AREA. APCH SAID THEY COULD NOT DSND ME BELOW 2500 FT ON AN IFR FLT PLAN AND ASKED IF I WANTED TO CANCEL IFR. I STATED THAT I WASN'T OBSERVING ANY FOG AND WAS IN VFR CONDITIONS. I SAID YES. APCH HANDED ME OFF TO ZZZ TWR; AND AFTER CHKING ON; THE CTLR AGAIN SAID FSS WAS RPTING 1/4 MI. I TOLD HIM I WAS SEEING ABSOLUTELY NO FOG ANYWHERE AND WOULD CONTINUE FOR THE RWY. IT WAS A COMPLETELY NORMAL APCH TO LNDG. ALTHOUGH I DID ENCOUNTER SOME LIGHT FOG IN THE FLARE; I NEVER LOST SIGHT OF THE RWY EDGE LIGHTS OR REIL'S AT ANY TIME. AFTER SHUTTING DOWN AND UNLOADING THE PATIENT INTO THE GND AMBULANCE; I ASKED THE MEDICAL TEAM TO LOOK AT THE CONDITIONS ON THE FIELD. THEY STATED THEY COULD CLRLY SEE RWY AND TXWY LIGHTS; LIGHTS FROM THE FBO ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE FIELD; LIGHTS ON ZZZ TWR AND STREET LIGHTS ON STREETS ADJACENT TO THE FIELD. IN RETROSPECT; EVEN THOUGH I COULD CLRLY SEE ALL RELEVANT RWY LIGHTS; WITH FSS RPTING 1/4 MI; I SHOULD HAVE DIVERTED. I WAS FEELING SOME PRESSURE TO COMPLETE THE TRANSPORT AS PLANNED SINCE THE PATIENT WAS ON A VENTILATOR. BY DIVERTING AND WAITING FOR THE GND AMBULANCE; THE VENTILATOR WOULD HAVE TO RUN ON BATTERY PWR FOR 15-20 MINS. I FELT THE EXTRA TIME COULD JEOPARDIZE PATIENT SAFETY. AT NO TIME DID I FEEL I JEOPARDIZED PATIENT OR CREW SAFETY BY LNDG AT ZZZ.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.