37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 654784 |
Time | |
Date | 200504 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : ddc.airport |
State Reference | KS |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air taxi |
Make Model Name | Beechcraft Twin Turboprop Jet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | landing : roll |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : atp pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 18800 flight time type : 1200 |
ASRS Report | 654784 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air taxi |
Function | instruction : trainee |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Airport Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
While on a multi-engine training mission with a newly hired pilot; I was operating as a company pilot trainer/check airman needing to have demonstrated to me 2 ILS approachs; including a single-engine approach to a landing. The winds at gbd; great bend; ks; became a tailwind precluding lndgs from an ILS straight-in at gbd; so I diverted the student to ddc; which has an ILS into the current wind. Ddc ASOS verified VFR WX with suitable wind for its ILS. Not having planned to use dodge city; I did not check NOTAMS on the ground prior to takeoff. I didn't call the FSS to check NOTAMS upon deciding to divert on short notice. Upon finding out the ILS was not in service upon arrival; I switched the training approach to a VOR straight-in to runway 14 simulated single engine. (Lack of an ILS signal should have been a clue that the runway might be closed.) from the air on short final the runway looked unobstructed. At the same time the student put down full flaps (which is a commitment to land with an actual engine out landing. We were simulated engine out which would require a risky go around). On short final; I noticed a large cloth or canvas 'X' panel painted yellow; off of the runway surface between the threshold and the first approach light post. The 'X' marking was not on the runway but in the dirt. No other 'X' markings were in view from that point of view. As we were in a single engine landing near touchdown; I made the last seconds available to conclude that; since the 'X' panel was in the dirt off of the runway; no other markers were in sight; and no workers were in sight; the runway was open because it was sunday and no workers were around. After an uneventful landing; a barrier across the far departure end came in view; as well as barriers that blocked access from the txwys near the intersection of runway 2/20 and runway 14/32. It became obvious; due to the barriers; not obvious due to 'X' markings on the arrival end of runway 14; that the runway was closed. We taxied clear of the runway onto a taxiway that had a barricade between us and the taxiway to runway 2/20 which was open. I lineman saw our predicament and moved part of the barricade which allowed us to taxi to the open runway and depart. No other aircraft; vehicles; or persons were seen or heard. Upon arriving at home base; NOTAMS were checked and found to have been published to announce the runway closure. I cannot assume a VFR airport on a nice day does not have NOTAMS. I must check every time. I was not under the impression that an 'X' off of the runway surface was a proper 'closed' marking. Had I checked for NOTAMS first; I would have known that the barricade was intended to mean that the entire runway was closed. I guess that the good to come of the matter was the instructional value to both of us. I have a 30+ yr career with no accidents; incidents; violations; or even felt the need to file a NASA report prior until now. I was embarrassed; humbled; and thankful of no problems caused by landing on a closed runway.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A KING AIR PLT AND INSTRUCTOR LANDED ON A CLOSED RWY AT DDC PRACTICING A SINGLE ENG APCH.
Narrative: WHILE ON A MULTI-ENG TRAINING MISSION WITH A NEWLY HIRED PLT; I WAS OPERATING AS A COMPANY PLT TRAINER/CHK AIRMAN NEEDING TO HAVE DEMONSTRATED TO ME 2 ILS APCHS; INCLUDING A SINGLE-ENG APCH TO A LNDG. THE WINDS AT GBD; GREAT BEND; KS; BECAME A TAILWIND PRECLUDING LNDGS FROM AN ILS STRAIGHT-IN AT GBD; SO I DIVERTED THE STUDENT TO DDC; WHICH HAS AN ILS INTO THE CURRENT WIND. DDC ASOS VERIFIED VFR WX WITH SUITABLE WIND FOR ITS ILS. NOT HAVING PLANNED TO USE DODGE CITY; I DID NOT CHK NOTAMS ON THE GND PRIOR TO TKOF. I DIDN'T CALL THE FSS TO CHK NOTAMS UPON DECIDING TO DIVERT ON SHORT NOTICE. UPON FINDING OUT THE ILS WAS NOT IN SVC UPON ARR; I SWITCHED THE TRAINING APCH TO A VOR STRAIGHT-IN TO RWY 14 SIMULATED SINGLE ENG. (LACK OF AN ILS SIGNAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN A CLUE THAT THE RWY MIGHT BE CLOSED.) FROM THE AIR ON SHORT FINAL THE RWY LOOKED UNOBSTRUCTED. AT THE SAME TIME THE STUDENT PUT DOWN FULL FLAPS (WHICH IS A COMMITMENT TO LAND WITH AN ACTUAL ENG OUT LNDG. WE WERE SIMULATED ENG OUT WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A RISKY GAR). ON SHORT FINAL; I NOTICED A LARGE CLOTH OR CANVAS 'X' PANEL PAINTED YELLOW; OFF OF THE RWY SURFACE BTWN THE THRESHOLD AND THE FIRST APCH LIGHT POST. THE 'X' MARKING WAS NOT ON THE RWY BUT IN THE DIRT. NO OTHER 'X' MARKINGS WERE IN VIEW FROM THAT POINT OF VIEW. AS WE WERE IN A SINGLE ENG LNDG NEAR TOUCHDOWN; I MADE THE LAST SECONDS AVAILABLE TO CONCLUDE THAT; SINCE THE 'X' PANEL WAS IN THE DIRT OFF OF THE RWY; NO OTHER MARKERS WERE IN SIGHT; AND NO WORKERS WERE IN SIGHT; THE RWY WAS OPEN BECAUSE IT WAS SUNDAY AND NO WORKERS WERE AROUND. AFTER AN UNEVENTFUL LNDG; A BARRIER ACROSS THE FAR DEP END CAME IN VIEW; AS WELL AS BARRIERS THAT BLOCKED ACCESS FROM THE TXWYS NEAR THE INTXN OF RWY 2/20 AND RWY 14/32. IT BECAME OBVIOUS; DUE TO THE BARRIERS; NOT OBVIOUS DUE TO 'X' MARKINGS ON THE ARR END OF RWY 14; THAT THE RWY WAS CLOSED. WE TAXIED CLR OF THE RWY ONTO A TXWY THAT HAD A BARRICADE BTWN US AND THE TXWY TO RWY 2/20 WHICH WAS OPEN. I LINEMAN SAW OUR PREDICAMENT AND MOVED PART OF THE BARRICADE WHICH ALLOWED US TO TAXI TO THE OPEN RWY AND DEPART. NO OTHER ACFT; VEHICLES; OR PERSONS WERE SEEN OR HEARD. UPON ARRIVING AT HOME BASE; NOTAMS WERE CHKED AND FOUND TO HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED TO ANNOUNCE THE RWY CLOSURE. I CANNOT ASSUME A VFR ARPT ON A NICE DAY DOES NOT HAVE NOTAMS. I MUST CHK EVERY TIME. I WAS NOT UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT AN 'X' OFF OF THE RWY SURFACE WAS A PROPER 'CLOSED' MARKING. HAD I CHKED FOR NOTAMS FIRST; I WOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT THE BARRICADE WAS INTENDED TO MEAN THAT THE ENTIRE RWY WAS CLOSED. I GUESS THAT THE GOOD TO COME OF THE MATTER WAS THE INSTRUCTIONAL VALUE TO BOTH OF US. I HAVE A 30+ YR CAREER WITH NO ACCIDENTS; INCIDENTS; VIOLATIONS; OR EVEN FELT THE NEED TO FILE A NASA RPT PRIOR UNTIL NOW. I WAS EMBARRASSED; HUMBLED; AND THANKFUL OF NO PROBS CAUSED BY LNDG ON A CLOSED RWY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.