Narrative:

I performed a rig check on right&right of stabilizer cable pulleys. We had 4 each; non routine write-ups for cable pulley right&right and subsequent rig. 3 of the 4 non routine write-up's rii block was checked. Non routine write-up engineering order X. The rii was incorrectly marked as 'no.' I feel a corrective action should be put in place like a pop-up box for all final signoffs (is this rii?) or at least lower the rii block next to the final signoff block.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: B737 HAD 4 NON ROUTINE WRITE-UPS ON HORIZ STABILIZER CABLE PULLEY REPLACEMENTS. INSPECTOR MISSED RII ON 1 PULLEY.

Narrative: I PERFORMED A RIG CHK ON R&R OF STABILIZER CABLE PULLEYS. WE HAD 4 EACH; NON ROUTINE WRITE-UPS FOR CABLE PULLEY R&R AND SUBSEQUENT RIG. 3 OF THE 4 NON ROUTINE WRITE-UP'S RII BLOCK WAS CHKED. NON ROUTINE WRITE-UP ENGINEERING ORDER X. THE RII WAS INCORRECTLY MARKED AS 'NO.' I FEEL A CORRECTIVE ACTION SHOULD BE PUT IN PLACE LIKE A POP-UP BOX FOR ALL FINAL SIGNOFFS (IS THIS RII?) OR AT LEAST LOWER THE RII BLOCK NEXT TO THE FINAL SIGNOFF BLOCK.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.