37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 690869 |
Time | |
Date | 200603 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | oversight : coordinator |
ASRS Report | 690869 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper maintenance maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | other other : 3 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : manuals contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : logbook entry performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Chart Or Publication Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
I had gotten a call regarding an inbound write-up for a bird strike. I pulled up the appropriate documentation for the inspection which included the paperwork for the engine ingestion and facsimile'ed it. I had 2 engineering auths for fly-backs on other aircraft for 50 cycles and was waiting on calls to put maintenance notes on them. In the meantime; contract maintenance called and were done and needed to document the logbook. By mistake; due to call volume at my desk. I told him 50 cycle fly-back instead of 10 per the manual.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-300 INCURRED A BIRD STRIKE. CONTRACT TECHNICIANS ACCOMPLISHED AIRFRAME AND ENG INGESTION CHK. MAINT CTLR GAVE CONTRACT TECHNICIANS WRONG LIMITS FOR ENG RECHK.
Narrative: I HAD GOTTEN A CALL REGARDING AN INBOUND WRITE-UP FOR A BIRD STRIKE. I PULLED UP THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE INSPECTION WHICH INCLUDED THE PAPERWORK FOR THE ENG INGESTION AND FAX'ED IT. I HAD 2 ENGINEERING AUTHS FOR FLY-BACKS ON OTHER ACFT FOR 50 CYCLES AND WAS WAITING ON CALLS TO PUT MAINT NOTES ON THEM. IN THE MEANTIME; CONTRACT MAINT CALLED AND WERE DONE AND NEEDED TO DOCUMENT THE LOGBOOK. BY MISTAKE; DUE TO CALL VOLUME AT MY DESK. I TOLD HIM 50 CYCLE FLY-BACK INSTEAD OF 10 PER THE MANUAL.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.